Friday, September 17, 2010

Forget dams: Northeast Indian NGOs to Delhi, Beijing

*
<http://www.hindustantimes.com/Search/search.aspx?q=Rahul/HT%20Correspondent>Hindustan
Times*
Guwahati, September 16, 2010
**www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/600930.aspx*
<http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/600930.aspx#>*

Forget dams: NE NGOs to Delhi, Beijing

More than 50 social and green organizations in the Northeast have asked
Beijing and New Delhi to stop pursuing dams on the Yarlung Tsangpo/Siang
river that form the Brahmaputra downstream.

In a memorandum to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on September 10 -- a
copy was also submitted to Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao through the
Chinese Embassy -- the NGOs urged both countries to forget mega dam
projects and help create peace and trust between the two countries.

China has hydropower plans on the Yarlung Tsangpo on a strategic stretch
before it dips southward and flows into Arunachal Pradesh as the Siang.
India has in the pipeline several dam projects on the Siang to generate
at least 4000 MW of electricity. Greens and anti-dam activists fear
these projects would make the Northeast swing between acute water crisis
and submergence.

"This is the first iniative by 51 civil organizations seeking a dialogue
with China besides the Indian government on the crucial issue of mega
dams," said Ravindra Nath of River Basin Friends based at Akajan in
northeastern Assam.

The memorandum notes: "We see a conflict brewing because of dams
proposed by both India and China. For this reason, both the countries
must refrain from building any dams in the whole stretch of this
(Tsangpo-Siang-Brahmaputra) river. This will help build peace and trust
between the two countries. Building dams on the Siang or Yarlung Tsangpo
will, therefore, be considered as seeking conflict."

It also argues: "One cannot allow thousands of people to be displaced
from their ancestral villages for electricity to power a mere 8-10 per
cent growth. Nor can we allow millions of trees, medicinal plants and
fauna to be submerged or perished because of lack of water."

The memorandum reminded China that blocking the Yarlung Tsangpo would
devastate ecosystems and livelihoods of people in Tibet besides India's
Northeast and Bangladesh downstream.

*
* <http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/600930.aspx#>
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: china@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

ANALYSIS-Africa makes strides in green energy

ANALYSIS-Africa makes strides in green energy

Friday September 17, 2010 04:19:13 PM GMT
www.forexyard.com/en/news/ANALYSIS-Africa-makes-strides-in-green-energy-2010-09-16T131940Z

Reuters News <http://addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&username=xa-4b3b289a78ad3f92
>
AFRICA-GREENENERGY/(ANALYSIS)

* Wind and geothermal set to take off

* Investors happy with energy policies

* U.N. says funding available locally

By Duncan Miriri

NAIROBI, Sept 16 (Reuters) - A global clamour for cuts in emissions,
growing investor appetite for energy sector projects and sound
government policies could help Africa make strides in green energy
generation in the next few years.

Some governments, like Kenya, plan to raise the amount of energy
generated from renewable sources like wind and solar, to cut
overreliance on expensive sources and stabilise power supplies.

Others, like South Africa, need to reduce their carbon footprint, one
of the world's highest.

"Africa has immense opportunities to take the lead," said Achim
Steiner, head of the United Nations Environmental Programme, citing
wind farms in Kenya and methane to electricity projects in Rwanda.

"It is not inconceivable that Kenya will triple, quadruple its power
generation and reduce in absolute terms its C02 emissions and perhaps
become a CO2 neutral electricity generating economy."

Under the east African nation's feed-in tariffs, private investors are
guaranteed $0.12 per kilowatt hour up to 100 megawatts generated.

Kenya and South Africa combined could have an extra 1,625 megawatts
from wind by 2013 if all planned projects -- both private and
government-sponsored -- are completed on schedule.

Kenya has a capacity of 1,350 megawatts from all sources and South
Africa can generate 40,000 megawatts from all sources.

Analysts say there is money available for green energy projects in
Africa, boosted by rising concerns about climate change and the
availability of cheap products from China.

"There is a lot of funding available for these projects, because it is
certainly top of mind in the West at the moment, there is a lot of
product that can be sourced relatively cheaply from China," said
Cornelis van der Waal, energy analyst at consultancy Frost & Sullivan.

North Africa has been leading in the push for investments in wind
energy because of an active renewable energy policy and a programme
based on public-private partnerships.

Countries elsewhere on the continent are only now putting proper
regulations and incentives in the form of renewable feed-in tariffs in
place.

Analysts said the establishment of a unit in South Africa --
independent from state utility Eskom -- to purchase power from private
investors is critical.

"Investors are starting to be a little bit itchy because they have
been planning for a very long time and it's been too long since the
announcement of the renewable feed-in tariff," van der Waal said.

As the continent's largest economy, South Africa depends on coal for
90 percent of its electricity. Eskom has been struggling to plug a
national power deficit owing to fast-rising demand and its own
financial problems.

SOUND POLICIES

Countries that have aligned their energy policies with the national
interest will be at an advantage because investors are attracted to
markets whose policies are driven by high level officials with an
appreciation of the strategic importance of energy to an economy.

Rwanda, with its methane gas -- found under Lake Kivu -- to
electricity projects, is an example of a country that is getting its
energy policies right, the U.N. says.

Under a pilot scheme at the lake, the central African nation is
producing 3.6 megawatts, with a view of stepping that up to more than
50 megawatts in the months ahead at a cost of $130-$280 million.

Gachao Kiuna, the chief executive of Transcentury, a Nairobi-based
investment group that focuses on power and infrastructure, says apart
from the environmental benefits of green generation, it is quite
practical to the continent.

Given its power deficit, Africa may be keener to tap emerging green
technologies like wind and geothermal than the west where there is no
shortage of large-scale, cheap technologies like nuclear facilities,
he said.

A wind farm project can be completed faster than a hydropower plant,
while geothermal projects attract minimum running costs, once drilling
of wells is completed.

Transcentury plans to develop 100-300 megawatts in the next five years
at an estimated cost of $2 million per megawatt from environment-
friendly sources like geothermal.

Other investors have already started putting in money. The Lake
Turkana Wind Power project, which will be the biggest on the continent
when completed in the next two to three years, has secured funding.

Barclays Bank works with the International Finance Corporation to
develop new financial products to mitigate against climate change.

The programme aims to support renewable energy projects in Nigeria,
South Africa and Kenya where officials are in the process of setting
up an open-ended green energy fund financed locally and from
international development partners.

UNEP's Steiner says African nations can contribute a huge chunk of the
funds required to fund energy generation from green sources.

"Finance is absolutely critical. We shouldn't underestimate the
potential of African economies to also generate finance domestically,"
he said.

For a factbox on new green energy projects in Africa: (Additional
reporting by Flak in Johannesburg; Editing by James Macharia and Sue
Thomas)
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Chinese loan underwrites Lake Turkana destruction

Chinese loan underwrites Lake Turkana destruction
International Rivers - Friends of Lake Turkana - BankTrack
September 17, 2010

NGOs are outraged after confirmation that the world's largest bank will
finance the destructive Gibe 3 hydropower dam. The Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) is underwriting a $500 million contract
awarded May 13 to Dongfang Electric Corporation for the dam's turbines
and electro-mechanical works. Although ICBC has not publicly announced
the loan, an official confirmed September 8 by email that the financial
agreement between ICBC and the Ethiopian government was signed in July.
The funding undermines ICBC's efforts to build a global reputation as a
socially and environmentally responsible lending institution.

Ethiopia's Omo River is a lifeline to Lake Turkana in northern Kenya.
The 1,870 MW Gibe 3 Dam would shrink the Omo River's flow into Lake
Turkana, devastating the lake and some 300,000 indigenous people who
depend on it. Severe degradation of Lake Turkana would intensify tribal
conflicts and could destabilize the already volatile area between the
Ethiopian, Kenyan, and Sudanese borders.

Ikal Angelei, Chair of Friends of Lake Turkana, said: /"ICBC is
underwriting the destruction of our peoples. Their funding is a hideous
gesture of the destruction Chinese funds can bring to Africa's poorest
communities."/

Friends of Lake Turkana has filed a lawsuit in Kenyan court over the
government's failure to protect Lake Turkana communities from the dam.
Since 2009, Lake Turkana communities have voiced their opposition to the
Gibe 3 Dam through demonstrations, petitions and meetings with
government officials. A public demonstration against ICBC's loan is
planned in Nairobi for September 28.

Terri Hathaway, Director of International Rivers' Africa Program, said:
/"Development banks and other private banks have turned away from Gibe 3
Dam. Even Italy's export credit agency refused to support the Italian
contractor. It is disturbing that ICBC will fund a project which breaks
Ethiopian law and has been shunned by the international community."/

The Gibe 3 Dam is Ethiopia's largest public infrastructure project to
date. The dam's contract was awarded in 2006 to Italian construction
giant, Salini Costruttori, without international competitive bidding.
Construction began the same year in violation of Ethiopian law and
without securing external funding. Four years of aggressive efforts by
the Ethiopian government and Salini had failed to attract external
funding. In July, the African Development Bank and the European
Investment Bank withdrew their funding consideration for the Gibe 3 Dam.
In 2008, JPMorgan Chase and SACE, the Italian export credit agency, both
refused to finance the dam.

Sonja Willems, Campaign Coordinator of BankTrack said, /"This loan makes
a mockery of ICBC's actions to establish itself as a socially and
environmentally responsible lender. As the world's largest bank, ICBC
should strive to become an environmental leader, but instead is building
a reputation of undercutting other banks' standards and financing
untouchable projects."/

*Gibe 3 Dam Background*
The Gibe 3 Dam Environmental Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) was
finalized in January 2009, more than two years after the dam contract
was awarded and construction began. The government of Ethiopia broke its
own law in 2006 when it awarded the contract without the approval of the
ESIA by the country's Environmental Protection Authority. The ESIA has
been criticized for its poor analysis and significant gaps in its scope,
namely the dam's impact to Lake Turkana.

Due to concerns over the dam's impact to Lake Turkana, in 2009 the
African Development Bank commissioned an independent study by Dr. Sean
Avery. [1] The study confirmed that the Gibe 3 Dam would reduce flows
and threaten the lake's most productive fishing area. It also noted that
large-scale irrigation could cut the river's flow by an additional 30%,
an impact neglected in the ESIA.

A 2009 independent report by the African Resources Working Group
<http://www.arwg-gibe.org/>warned that the Gibe 3 Dam could lead to a 12
meter drop in Lake Turkana's water level. [2] Reduced flow would largely
be caused by abstraction for large irrigation and seepage losses from
the reservoir. Neither impact has been sufficiently studied.

Project developers have ignored the dam's potential to intensify
existing tribal conflicts. A 2009 USAID report recommended that a
project conflict vulnerability assessment for the downstream indigenous
ethnic groups should be conducted. [3]

Notes

[1] Avery, Sean. April 2010. Assessment of Hydrological Impacts of
Ethiopia's Omo Basin on Kenya's Lake Turkana Water Levels. (draft
report) Commissioned By The African Development Bank.

[2] ARWG. 2009. A Commentary on the Environmental, Socioeconomic and
Human Rights Impacts of the Proposed Gibe III Dam in the Lower Omo River
Basin of Ethiopia. Available at www.arwg-gibe.org
<http://www.arwg-gibe.org>.

[3] Johnston, Leslie. January 2009. Ethiopia – Gibe III Hydropower
Project Trip Report - January 12 – 30. USAID/Washington, EGAT/ESP.
________________________________________________

This is International Rivers' mailing list on China's global footprint, and particularly Chinese investment in
international dam projects.

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: chinaglobal@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Chinese businessmen keen to invest in Nepal

www.nepalnews.com/main/index.php/business-a-economy/9224--chinese-businessmen-keen-to-invest-in-nepal-.html
<http://www.nepalnews.com/main/index.php/business-a-economy/9224--chinese-businessmen-keen-to-invest-in-nepal-.html>
Chinese businessmen keen to invest in Nepal
NepalNews. com, Friday, 17 September 2010 11:11

The Chinese private sector is keen to invest in hydropower, tourism and
agricultural sectors of Nepal.

While speaking in the 11th meeting of Nepal-China Non-Government
Cooperation Forum in the capital on Thursday, Chinese ambassador to
Nepal Qiu Guohong said," Chinese hydropower companies are looking to
exploit opportunities to participate in hydropower generation in Nepal."
A high-level 40-member Chinese team has come to Nepal to attend the
forum and most of them belong to reputed businesses.

The business delegation led by the All-China Federation of Industry and
Commerce (ACFIC) first vice-chairman Quan Zhezhu, who is also a
vice-minister, has entrepreneurs from established and renowned Chinese
private companies in the areas of tourism, aviation, metallurgy, real
estate, medicines and mechanical engineering.

Nepal's potential water storage capacity stands at 83 million KW, which
is 2.3 percent of the water storage capacity all over the world, the
envoy said. Out of which, 42 million KW can be used for generating
electricity. "If the Chinese hydropower companies present in this forum
clearly understand the policies, status and opportunity for hydropower
investment in Nepal, they will not shy away from investing in the
sector," he said.

The Chinese businesspersons told their Nepali counterparts that they
were seeking to invest in hydro projects ranging from 10 MW to 500
MW. "Even the district-based small Nepali entrepreneurs can invest in
hydropower sector by forging collaboration with the Chinese," said Kush
Kumar Joshi, president of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industry
(FNCCI).

ACFIC first vice-chairman Quan said that he would bring reputed Chinese
companies here to explore the new investment avenues in Nepal.

The Chinese investment in the sectors such as hydropower, mines,
agriculture, pharmaceuticals, banking and tourism among others, will
play a vital role for the development of Nepal," said Rajesh Kazi
Shrestha, chairman of Nepal China Chamber of Commerce and Industry (NCCCI).

The Nepal-China Non-Governmental Cooperation Forum was established in
1996 with the initiatives from the business organisations of the two
countries.

In 2009, the two countries' trade volume reached US$ 440 million. It
reached US$ 237 million during January to May 2010.

According to the Department of Industries, aspiring Chinese investors
registered 58 joint venture industries with a total project cost of Rs
731.25 million last fiscal year, against 27 JVs from India, reports said.
________________________________________________

This is International Rivers' mailing list on China's global footprint, and particularly Chinese investment in
international dam projects.

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: chinaglobal@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Chinese Loan Underwrites Lake Turkana Destruction

Chinese Loan Underwrites Lake Turkana Destruction
For Immediate Release - September 17, 2010
http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/5819

Contacts
Ikal Angelei, Friends of Lake Turkana (Kenya) +254 736 685 118
ikal@friendsoflaketurkana.org
Terri Hathaway, International Rivers (US) +1 510 848 1155
terri@internationalrivers.org
Sonja Willems, BankTrack (Netherlands) +31 24 324 9220 sonja@banktrack.org


NGOs are outraged after confirmation that the world's largest bank will
finance the destructive Gibe 3 hydropower dam. The Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) is underwriting a $500 million contract
awarded May 13 to Dongfang Electric Corporation for the dam's turbines
and electro-mechanical works. Although ICBC has not publicly announced
the loan, an official confirmed September 8 by email that the financial
agreement between ICBC and the Ethiopian government was signed in July.
The funding undermines ICBC's efforts to build a global reputation as a
socially and environmentally responsible lending institution.

Ethiopia's Omo River is a lifeline to Lake Turkana in northern Kenya.
The 1,870 MW Gibe 3 Dam would shrink the Omo River's flow into Lake
Turkana, devastating the lake and some 300,000 indigenous people who
depend on it. Severe degradation of Lake Turkana would intensify tribal
conflicts and could destabilize the already volatile area between the
Ethiopian, Kenyan, and Sudanese borders.

Ikal Angelei, Chair of Friends of Lake Turkana, said: "ICBC is
underwriting the destruction of our peoples. Their funding is a hideous
gesture of the destruction Chinese funds can bring to Africa's poorest
communities."

Friends of Lake Turkana has filed a lawsuit in Kenyan court over the
government's failure to protect Lake Turkana communities from the dam.
Since 2009, Lake Turkana communities have voiced their opposition to the
Gibe 3 Dam through demonstrations, petitions and meetings with
government officials. A public demonstration against ICBC's loan is
planned in Nairobi for September 28.

Terri Hathaway, Director of International Rivers' Africa Program, said:
"Development banks and other private banks have turned away from Gibe 3
Dam. Even Italy's export credit agency refused to support the Italian
contractor. It is disturbing that ICBC will fund a project which breaks
Ethiopian law and has been shunned by the international community."

The Gibe 3 Dam is Ethiopia's largest public infrastructure project to
date. The dam's contract was awarded in 2006 to Italian construction
giant, Salini Costruttori, without international competitive bidding.
Construction began the same year in violation of Ethiopian law and
without securing external funding. Four years of aggressive efforts by
the Ethiopian government and Salini had failed to attract external
funding. In July, the African Development Bank and the European
Investment Bank withdrew their funding consideration for the Gibe 3 Dam.
In 2008, JPMorgan Chase and SACE, the Italian export credit agency, both
refused to finance the dam.

Sonja Willems, Campaign Coordinator of BankTrack said, "This loan makes
a mockery of ICBC's actions to establish itself as a socially and
environmentally responsible lender. As the world's largest bank, ICBC
should strive to become an environmental leader, but instead is building
a reputation of undercutting other banks' standards and financing
untouchable projects."


Gibe 3 Dam Background
The Gibe 3 Dam Environmental Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) was
finalized in January 2009, more than two years after the dam contract
was awarded and construction began. The government of Ethiopia broke its
own law in 2006 when it awarded the contract without the approval of the
ESIA by the country's Environmental Protection Authority. The ESIA has
been criticized for its poor analysis and significant gaps in its scope,
namely the dam's impact to Lake Turkana.

Due to concerns over the dam���s impact to Lake Turkana, in 2009 the
African Development Bank commissioned an independent study by Dr. Sean
Avery. [1] The study confirmed that the Gibe 3 Dam would reduce flows
and threaten the lake's most productive fishing area. It also noted that
large-scale irrigation could cut the river's flow by an additional 30%,
an impact neglected in the ESIA.

A 2009 independent report by the African Resources Working Group warned
that the Gibe 3 Dam could lead to a 12 meter drop in Lake Turkana's
water level. [2] Reduced flow would largely be caused by abstraction for
large irrigation and seepage losses from the reservoir. Neither impact
has been sufficiently studied.

Project developers have ignored the dam's potential to intensify
existing tribal conflicts. A 2009 USAID report recommended that a
project conflict vulnerability assessment for the downstream indigenous
ethnic groups should be conducted. [3]

[1] Avery, Sean. April 2010. Assessment of Hydrological Impacts of
Ethiopia's Omo Basin on Kenya's Lake Turkana Water Levels. (draft
report) Commissioned By The African Development Bank.

[2] ARWG. 2009. A Commentary on the Environmental, Socioeconomic and
Human Rights Impacts of the Proposed Gibe III Dam in the Lower Omo River
Basin of Ethiopia. Available at www.arwg-gibe.org.

[3] Johnston, Leslie. January 2009. Ethiopia – Gibe III Hydropower
Project Trip Report - January 12 – 30. USAID/Washington, EGAT/ESP.
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

AfDB pres says G. Inga will happen "soon"

(he's a bit delusional, I guess.....)


http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/afdb-will-consider-more-funding-for-eskom-kaberuka-2010-09-13

ELECTRICITY
AfDB will consider more funding for Eskom � Kaberuka


By: Matthew Hill
13th September 2010

African Development Bank (AfDB) president Donald Kaberuka at the
weekend said that the financial institution would consider stumping up
further funding to South African power utility Eskom, and that there
was "no doubt" that the Grand Inga hydropower project would happen
"soon".

AfDB had already loaned $1,6-billion to Eskom for the construction of
the Medupi coal-fired power station in Lephalale, in Limpopo province,
and had "full confidence in the financial sustainability of Eskom",
Kaberuka told Engineering News Online.

"What's important is South Africa, as the regional powerhouse, must
have energy for its own economy - for its mining sector - but also to
feed into the power pools of the region. If South Africa doesn't have
enough power, it is [also] Zimbabwe, Zambia, Mozambique, and Namibia,"
he said on the sidelines of the World Energy Congress in Montreal.

"I'm confident that Eskom is a financially sustainable company going
forward."

Cash-strapped Eskom had previously said it would have to delay the
Kusile coal-fired power station being built near Emalahleni, in
Mpumalanga province.

The South African government may provide the power utility with
further debt guarantees if required, Bloomberg quoted the National
Treasury director-general as saying last week.

Asked if the AfDB would consider providing funding for Kusile
specifically, Kaberuka said: "I'd consider any project which is
financially viable, which makes economic sense, and which helps South
Africa close the energy gap. It is critically important that we do
that."

Kaberuka said that energy projects were absorbing one-half of the
AfDB's financing, and that this was still not enough.

He said that less than one-fifth of the continent's hydropower
potential had been tapped.

Offering the biggest potential was the Grand Inga project in the
Democratic Republic of Congo, but little progress had been made thus
far.

Still, Kaberuka was upbeat about its future.

"There are issues to be resolved, but there is no doubt in my mind
that Grand Inga will happen soon," he said, without saying by when.


Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Monday, September 13, 2010

World economy: The China cycle

World economy: The China cycle

By Geoff Dyer

Published: September 12 2010 20:03 | Last updated: September 12 2010 20:03

www.ft.com

Deep in the Amazon jungle, huge chunks of red earth are torn out of the
ground at Carajás, the biggest iron ore mine in the world, to be
transported halfway round the globe to the steel mills on China's
eastern seaboard. There they are turned into the backbone for millions
of tower blocks in hundreds of booming Chinese cities.

Last year, China overtook the US to become Brazil's biggest trading
partner. The two large developing countries may be on opposite sides of
the planet but their growing economic ties over the past decade have
become among the enduring symbols of shifts in the global economy.

The duo could also be forging a path for one of the potential biggest
realignments in the global economy over the next decade. With little
fanfare, China is likely to emerge as the biggest direct investor in
Brazil this year, following a string of deals announced in mining,
steel, construction equipment and electricity transmission.

Such investments are part of a slow-burning but hugely important trend.
Newly crowned the second-largest economy, eclipsing Japan, China is
becoming the anchor for a new cycle of self-sustaining economic
development between Asia and the rest of the developing world – one that
is bypassing the economies of Europe and the US.

China is not only sucking in raw materials from other developing
economies, just as it has during the past decade. It has also begun
making investments in infrastructure and industry in those countries,
some of which are made possible by its cut-price and increasingly
sophisticated manufacturing companies or by the attractive financing
terms it can offer. Beijing has for some years been investing in this
way in parts of Africa: now such deals are being rolled out around the
world. For many developing countries, the impact of the China boom is
coming full circle.

"It is the start of a new cycle," says Ben Simpfendorfer, an economist
at RBS and author of The New Silk Road, a book on the surging economic
ties between China and the Middle East, central Asia and south Asia.
"China has companies that are willing to invest, they have products that
are good enough, and they are backed by abundant liquidity in the
country's financial system."

Ian Bremmer, president of the Eurasia consultancy and author of the
recent book, The End of The Free Market, says there is no accident to
this China-led process of decoupling from the west. It is, he says, a
strategy to reduce economic – and to some extent political – dependence
on the US.

"It is a very conscious policy, on the top of the agenda for the entire
Chinese leadership," he says. "They are looking for a hedging strategy
because they feel uncertain about the long-term economic prospects of
the developed world."

Promoting innovation and stimulating domestic consumption are also part
of that strategy, he argues, but pushing stronger economic integration
with the rest of the developing world is the "one strategy that can be
done quite quickly".

Nowhere is the impact of this process being felt more keenly than in Brazil.

As trade has boomed with China during the past decade, Brazilians have
sometimes complained of being relegated once again to their 20th-century
role of providing commodities to the industrial powers. In the past
year, however, the long-awaited wave of Chinese investment in the
country appears finally to have reached Brazil's shores. While it
reached only $92m in 2009, the country's officials estimate that it will
exceed $10bn this year.

Wuhan Iron and Steel, for instance, paid $400m for a stake in a mining
company owned by Brazilian industrialist Eike Batista, and is planning
to build a huge steel mill beside the port near Rio de Janeiro that
another of Mr Batista's companies is constructing. Lifan, one of China's
biggest manufacturers of motorcycles and cars, already exports heavily
to Brazil. Now the company's founder, Yin Mingshan, says it is
considering opening a plant to build cars in the country. "Brazil is a
very promising market, with a vast territory and a big domestic market,"
he says. "Some Chinese businessmen are foolish enough to ignore doing
business in Brazil but I am not that stupid."

If investment in Brazil is one symbol of this new stage of economic
Chinese engagement with the developing world, another is the flurry of
new rail networks taking shape globally. Chinese railway construction
companies are some of the most efficient anywhere, and have for several
years been operating in neighbouring countries in central and south-east
Asia. But in the past year they have also signed contracts in such
diverse places as Ukraine, Turkey and Argentina.

Chinese companies in the sector have not restricted their activities to
the manual task of laying rail lines. They are hoping to start signing
overseas deals to sell high-speed rail equipment, including locomotives
and signalling systems. The first customer could be the planned
high-speed line between São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.

There are two factors that have made these new links possible. The first
is that China has produced a generation of companies making capital
goods that are now internationally competitive. They can offer
developing countries new trains, power stations, mining machinery and
telecommunications equipment of sufficient quality at prices that are
often well below those of their multinational competitors.

The second element is the financial backing from a banking system that
has been mobilised to follow behind these businesses. Yi Huiman, a
senior executive at Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, told a
conference recently that the institution was working with the government
to provide "railroads plus finance" around the world. Vale, the
Brazilian company that operates the giant iron ore mine in the Amazon,
announced on Friday that it had signed a $1.23bn credit with two Chinese
banks to finance the purchase of 12 huge cargo ships from a Chinese
shipyard, which will transport iron ore between the two countries.

The scale of these transactions is clearly much smaller than Beijing's
holdings of US securities, estimated to be in the order of $1,500bn, but
the underlying dynamic is the same: the Chinese financial system is
starting to recycle some of its holdings of foreign currency into the
economies of its developing country trading partners, in order to
stimulate demand for its own goods.

The impact is already apparent in China's trade statistics, with the
biggest increases in exports in the past year coming from developing
countries. Trade with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
increased by 54.7 per cent in the first half of the year, and by 60.3
per cent with Brazil.

If Chinese investment does indeed help to kick off a growth cycle in
other parts of the developing world, it will be a tonic for a global
economy in which the outlook for many leading economies remains subdued,
with some even facing the risk of a double-dip recession. The
combination of Chinese demand and booming investment is one reason for
Brazil's ability to record China-style growth rates of 8.9 per cent in
the first half of the year.

Yet for western economies there are also plenty or risks involved. The
investment push is likely to herald an era of intense competition
between developed-world multinationals and state-owned Chinese
companies. The strong financial backing that such groups receive is also
likely to fuel accusations that they are not playing on a level field.
It is perhaps no surprise that some of the multinationals that in recent
months have publicly voiced criticisms of Beijing's industrial policies
– GE and Siemens – operate in sectors in which China is becoming a
fierce competitor, such as power equipment and railways.

China's new clout is also raising questions about the future of the
dollar. Chinese officials have talked about a long-term goal of
replacing it as the global reserve currency with a basket of others,
potentially including the renminbi.

As trade with the developing world balloons, Beijing has also been
taking important steps to expand the international use of the renminbi,
including allowing overseas holdings of the currency to be invested in
the onshore bond market. Some economists believe it could become the
reference currency for Asian trade over the course of the next decade.

Yet the irony is that, while there is strong economic momentum behind
the Chinese currency taking on a much larger international role, Beijing
is reluctant to let this happen. "China is still very hesitant about
whether it really wants the currency to be international," says Yu
Yongding, an influential economist at the Chinese Academy of Social
Sciences think-tank.

To become an important trading currency is one thing: but to become a
global reserve currency with the power to threaten the role of the
dollar, the government would need to lower capital controls and open up
its domestic bond market. This would mean giving up its tight control of
exchange and interest rates.

Furthermore, if economic integration with other developing countries is
really to take off, it will require careful management by Beijing. There
is a very real risk that the new-found interest in emerging markets will
provoke a backlash, especially if China's exports of manufactured goods
keep up such a rapid pace of growth.

There are already plenty of warning signs. India, for instance, has
tried this year to reduce supplies of Chinese power equipment in favour
of goods made by local producers. For several months, New Delhi blocked
Huawei, the Chinese maker of telecoms equipment, from the Indian market.

In Brazil, there are fears that companies such as carmaker Lifan want to
use the country to assemble kits of nearly-completed cars made in China
rather than promote a domestic industry. There is also concern about
fresh competition for access to markets elsewhere in Latin America.
Kevin Gallagher of Boston University calculates that 91 per cent of
Brazilian exports of manufactured goods to the region are under threat
from lower-priced Chinese products. If that market wilts away, industry
is likely to become much more critical of the new China ties.

China's growing links with the rest of the developing world could
provide a huge boost both to the country itself and to the global
economy during the course of the next decade. But a wave of
protectionism could yet halt the process. Beijing will need to work hard
to ensure its new partners in the developing world do not feel
steamrollered by the Chinese juggernaut.
________________________________________________ This is International Rivers' mailing list on China's global footprint, and particularly Chinese investment in international dam projects. You received this message as a subscriber on the list: chinaglobal@list.internationalrivers.org To be removed from the list, please visit: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp