Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Africa Review - Protest against Sudan dam enters third week

(For background on Merowe Dam see http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/350)

--------------------------------------------------
Protest against Sudan dam enters third week


By REEM ABBAS in Khartoum

Posted Tuesday, December 6 2011 at 17:51


http://www.africareview.com/News/Protest+against+Sudan+dam+enters+third+week/-/979180/1285136/-/tyjapf/-/
A sit-in by the Manasir community in Al Damar, the capital of Sudan's
River Nile State, has entered its third week.

The Manasir who come from Merowe in northern Sudan, are one of the
ethnic groups claiming to have been disadvantaged by the multi-billion
dollar Merowe Hydropower Dam project.

Hundreds of ethnic Manasir have been camping at the Tahrir Square in
Al Damer and many more are joining the protests from other states.

International Rivers, a global organisation that has been reporting on
the ecological and human cost of the Merowe Dam, estimates that at
least 70,000 people were displaced as a result of the project.

In 2008, 22 villages inhabited by the Manasir were flooded, forcing
people out of their homes.

In a statement by the committee responsible for organising the
protests and subsequent sit-in since November 20, the Manasir demanded
compensation for the ignored deal between them and the government.

Mr Al Rashed Al Affendi, the spokesperson of the Manasir executive
committee, stated that they would not stop protesting just because the
government promised to resolve their problems, insisting they wanted
to see proof.

The State minister for Finance in River Nile State has admitted that
there had been a delay in solving the Manasir case that had led to
complications, but he criticised the protest.

National parties have asked the government to meet the demands of the
protestors and look into the killings of protestors in Kajbar and
Amri, where the Kajbar and Dal dams are set to be built.
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Climate Change Threatens Africa’s Biggest Water Sources

http://www.voanews.com/english/news/africa/pan/Climate-Change-Threatens-Africas-Biggest-Water-Sources--134258698.html

November 21, 2011
Climate Change Threatens Africa�s Biggest Water Sources
by Darren Taylor | Johannesburg, South Africa

Part 3 of a 5-part series on Climate Change

�Water is the primary medium through which people in Africa will
experience climate change impacts. By 2020, it is estimated that (up
to) 250 million Africans will be exposed to increased water stress,�
writes South Africa-based scientist Dr. Mary Galvin in a recent
analysis of the effects of hotter weather on Africa�s water supplies.
According to leading climatologists, large parts of Africa could warm
by as much as four degrees C by 2100. But an increase of just one
degree C will have �terrible� consequences for the continent�s water
sources and the people who rely on them to survive, said Kenyan
ecological economist, Dr. Kevin Chika Urama.

Scientists say the world is warming because mainly industrial nations
have for a long time pumped harmful emissions, such as carbon from
coal burning for energy, into the earth�s atmosphere.
Urama is co-author of an internationally acclaimed paper that has
examined the effects of climate change on water in Africa. He
concluded that the region�s water sources will face, and in fact are
already facing, a �multitude� of challenges because of the phenomenon.
These include intense droughts and floods, the drying up of rivers and
lakes that have sustained life for centuries, associated �wars� for
scarce water and huge increases in the numbers of �water refugees.�

64 African river basins in jeopardy

Urama said increasingly strange weather patterns are already causing
havoc across Africa. He recalled a visit to Nigeria in mid-October,
which is usually a dry period for that country. But heavy rain, said
the economist, had washed away crops and flooded cities and towns.

Taryn Pereira, an environmentalist with South Africa�s Environmental
Monitoring Group, is researching changing weather systems in Africa.
She said areas accustomed to regular rainfall are now suffering
prolonged droughts.

Pereira highlighted the example of South Africa�s Southern Cape
region, which up until recent years experienced regular rainfall year
round. �That area has just had the lowest rainfall in 130 years of
recording rainfall,� she said. �Entire districts and towns ran out of
water. People were sharing water with livestock.�

Extreme variability in weather will be more prevalent in Africa in the
near future, Urama said, resulting in widespread water scarcity.
�We�re seeing how much carnage that is causing at the moment in
Somalia and Kenya,� he pointed out.

The water resource expert predicted that future droughts will be worse
than ever before, especially in areas that are traditionally dry, such
as the Horn of Africa.

Zambian environmental engineer Alex Simalabwi agreed. �With the
increase in temperatures, some regions are going to become much drier,
such as in North Africa along the Sahara desert,� he said. �For
southern Africa, the areas around the Kalahari desert and going down
to the west coast in Namibia are going to become much, much drier.�

Simalabwi is director of the Global Water Partnership�s water, climate
and development program. The organization is based in Stockholm and
advocates for a �water secure world.


As an advisor to several African governments, Simalabwi emphasizes
�intergovernmental protection� of Africa�s 64 river and lake basins.
He said if these aren�t properly managed and if states don�t use them
responsibly and put aside �narrow self interests� to cooperate to
share the water, the consequences for the entire continent are
�myriad� and �horrible.�
The scientist explained, �These basins are shared by various
countries. The economic development of Africa is dependent on these
water sources.�

But according to many environmental projections, climate change is
already harming the basins, such as Lake Victoria, which is shared by
Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda.

Water and fish: �slow disappearance�

Urama said flows from the thousands of streams that feed the world�s
largest tropical lake have dwindled in recent years because of factors
including hotter and drier weather.

The United Nations Environment Program has estimated that 30 million
people rely directly on Lake Victoria for their survival, with
millions more indirectly dependent on it for water and food. It�s one
of the biggest inland fisheries in the world.

But Urama said, �Lake Victoria is very prone to climate change impacts
because it has a large surface area compared with its volume. It�s
shallow, so this means that higher temperatures will mean much more
water evaporating from it.�

He said the higher temperatures, combined with over-fishing, are
causing the �slow disappearance� of the lake�s most important
commercial fish species, the Nile Perch.

Lake Victoria is also the major source of the Nile, the longest river
in the world. Simalabwi said, �A shrinking Lake Victoria means a
shrinking Nile,� which could threaten the livelihoods of 160 million
people in 10 African countries that depend on the Nile.

All over Africa, said Pereira, �Negative human impacts on water
resources are being worsened by the effects of climate change. Fish
species and fish numbers are declining and changing their behavior,
and that makes it very, very difficult for subsistence fishermen to
draw a livelihood from the environment�.�

Water wars

In the near future, said Urama, more people will be struggling for
less water � resulting in conflict across Africa. Simalabwi said the
�first signs� of this are already happening, in the form of violence
between pastoralists and farmers.

�The pastoralists graze their cattle in the wilds of Africa. But as
grazing areas dwindle because of higher temperatures, you find the
pastoralists encroaching on arable land where people grow their crops.�

Urama said the potential is also growing for conflict between local
African communities and foreign companies, which are increasingly
buying land in Africa.

�They�re buying that land because of decreasing resources in their own
countries, to produce food for export to their home countries. They�re
using up water resources that many Africans depend on. So we are
likely going to see conflicts between communities that are going to be
trying to resist these kinds of external investments that, though
economically viable for a country, may not be sustainable for the
communities that have relied on these water resources for ages.�


Simalabwi said people will be forced to flee from country to country
in search of water. �The refugee situation in Africa will become much
worse. This has a lot of implications in terms of regional stability
and peace.�
Urama said battles over meager water supplies will also pit humans
against animals. �Already you see a lot of conflicts between elephants
and humans in Kenya because of these dwindling resources,� he said.

According to Pereira, the tension over water won�t be limited to
Africa�s rural areas. She expects piped water to soon become much more
expensive in the cities. �The urban poor will be faced with much, much
higher water bills. When they don�t pay, the authorities will cut
their water off.�

This, Pereira said, had already resulted in riots in several African
countries, most notably in South Africa.

Floods may destroy communities, economies

While a lot of attention is on the droughts that look set to sweep
Africa, some regions will become much wetter, said Simalabwi. He
expected �transforming precipitation patterns� because of hotter
weather to result in more rain falling in Central Africa in the near
future.

�The region is already very wet, with the Congo Basin being one of the
biggest water towers in Africa. It�s expected to be much, much wetter
as a result of climate change�and this is going to lead to excessive
flooding.�

The floods, Simalabwi said, could be on such a large scale that they�d
�wipe out� entire communities and destroy economic growth in Central
Africa. �Agriculture will not be possible and mining and other
industries will shut down.�

Urama said African coastal areas will also experience more flooding,
as the sea level rises because of melting ice in polar regions.

Poor water management

The harm done by extreme weather caused by climate change is made
worse by the fact that water resources are poorly managed in Africa,
said Urama.

�While some places will see heavier rains, Africa generally does not
have the necessary systems of water harvesting so most of the water is
lost. So when the long droughts hit, Africans really suffer,� he said,
adding, �It�s the normal story in Africa � we have food abundance
during the harvest seasons, and we have starvation, famine in some
cases, during the lean periods. The same logic happens in the water
resources case.�

Simalabwi agreed, commenting, �What�s missing in many parts of Africa
is not the water, but the good management of the water.�

He maintained that one of the biggest constraints on Africa�s water
resources is �poor and inadequate� information. Simalabwi said most of
Africa�s hydrological monitoring stations, which are supposed to
calculate how much water they�re receiving and the sources of such
water, are dysfunctional.


�They are dilapidated; they are disused; they are not in a way that
you can rely on them to get accurate information of how much (water) a
country is using and how much water is moving from one country to the
other,� he said, asking, �If countries don�t know exactly how much
water they have available on average, how can they plan for climate
change events?�
Simalabwi also pointed out that many dams in Africa are in poor
condition. �They aren�t maintained,� he said. �So at the same time as
we are moaning about droughts, we are wasting our water.�

Urama called for big investments in the repair of existing dams and
the large scale construction of new water saving technologies. �We
live in a hot region so much water is lost through evaporation. Let�s
prevent this by building water storage dams that are below ground so
when there�s drought, communities will have access to clean water.�

But South African environmentalist Taryn Pereira said she sees little
evidence of any �real, tangible, practical planning� for climate
change in African water sectors.

Small steps

Simalabwi said it�s �very disappointing� that water won�t be on the
official agenda at the United Nations global climate talks scheduled
to begin in South Africa on November 28.

�Why the UNFCCC (UN Framework Convention on Climate Change) has not
dedicated special attention to discussing water resources is difficult
to understand,� he said. �When considering the already very bad
impacts climate change is having on water resources, it�s very
discouraging.�

Nevertheless, said Simalabwi, the Global Water Partnership still has
hope that at least small steps will be taken towards ensuring the
protection of water resources from present and future effects of
climate change.

�We are hopeful that during the talks some of the parties will call
for some of the references to water resources that are already in the
UNFCCC text to be made operational,� he said. �We are also hopeful
that the parties can agree on specific funding to protect water
resources from climate change, from the Green Fund, which is being
designed to help the world adapt to climate change.�

------------------

Learn more about climate change's impacts on dams and rivers in an
animated Google Earth tour, "The Wrong Climate for Damming Rivers": http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/6928

The video and tour allow viewers to learn about topics such as
reservoir emissions, dam safety, and adaptation while exploring real
case studies in Africa, the Himalayas and the Amazon.
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Bad Energy and Development Policies Contribute to Famine and Conflict in Africa

(From the Oakland Institute)


NEWS EMBARGOED UNTIL: 12:01 am EDT DEC. 6,
2011 MEDIA CONTACTS: Liam
O'Donoghue, lodonoghue@fenton.com, (415) 901-0111


Investigation Reveals that Bad Energy and Development Policies
Contribute to Famine and Conflict in Africa

Reports Showcase Bad Energy Policies from US and EU, Expose
Development Approach that Puts Control in Hands of Foreign Investors


Oakland, CA--At the same time that individuals across the US and EU
offer support to victims of famine and conflict in Africa, their
countries' energy policies and development agendas take food and other
resources away from Africans--while also harming the environment.

Research released today by the Oakland Institute demonstrates that
land grabs--largely unregulated land deals involving foreign
corporations and speculators--continue to be promoted as a
"development" solution for African nations. Development agencies
including USAID and the World Bank Group are often the architects of
these deals that promise benefits for Africans but fail to deliver.
Furthermore, the research shows that US and EU energy policies that
tout the benefits of agrofuels and carbon credits--key elements of
these land deals--are actually making climate change a bigger problem.

"The energy policies of these governments--along with the growing
Western market for agrofuels--is harming both the people of Africa and
the environment," Oakland Institute Executive Director Anuradha Mittal
said. "This approach of 'developing' Africa is neither just nor
sustainable. It is displacing people by taking over their land and
natural resources that produce food and provide livelihoods while
making climate change worse."

Mittal noted that people can follow the supply chain to identify the
bad actors--who claim benefits for Africa but seldom deliver: so-
called developers who determine how land will be used (such as Iowa-
based based AgriSol Energy and Texas-based Nile Trading Development),
companies that grow non-food crops on the land (including Sun Biofuels
and Addax Bioenergy), and groups that buy up agrofuels and timber
(including major western airlines such as Lufthansa).

The second phase of the "Understanding Land Investment Deals in
Africa" (www.oaklandinstitute.org/special-investigation-two-land-deals-africa
) report series focuses on these issues as well as the specific
nations of Mozambique, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Zambia. The reports
expose documents and actors promoting policies behind the deals that:

* Create additional food insecurity: The current trend of large-scale
land investments is taking away land and water from local populations
and transforming valuable grazing land, natural forests, and food-
producing fields into plantations for agrofuels and trees for export.
* Promise jobs but fail to deliver them: A close look at the actual
business plans dismantles the myth of job creation through
agricultural investments in Africa. For instance, Iowa-based Agrisol
claims to be "identifying local farm project managers" for a project
in Tanzania. However, managing director and political powerbroker
Bruce Rastetter has admitted the company plans instead to import white
South African farm managers for this work.
* Tout the promise of agrofuels: Although United Nations officials
have called the widespread agrofuel development in Africa a "crime
against humanity," fertile African lands are being turned into
agrofuel plantations with governments and corporations promoting
agrofuels as a solution to climate change. The United States and the
European Union have set targets to replace 30 percent and 10 percent,
respectively, of their gasoline with agrofuels.
* Create loopholes that help foreign investors but further impoverish
many African nations: Research exposes details of strategic investor
status and Investment Protection and Promotion Agreements that provide
extensive tax holidays, minimal fees for land and water usage, among
other incentives.

"In our research of over 50 land deals in seven African countries, we
did not find the evidence that such investments will provide fair
financial returns for the countries or their populations," Oakland
Institute Policy Director Frederic Mousseau said. "Even the IMF has
said that the generous tax incentives should be minimized since these
tax holidays and other breaks are saddling local governments with more
burdens than benefits."
Previous reports in this series were instrumental in stopping one
shady land deal in Southern Sudan by exposing how corrupt U.S.
investors were trying to enrich themselves through an exploitive
agreement. However, land grabs across the continent continue, despite
widespread opposition.

Environmental impacts also are detailed in the reports and include
problems such as:

* Displacing food crops to grow agrofuels such as jatropha--reducing
the amount of food available and requiring twice the water that cereal
needs to grow.
* Clearing native forests and grassland to replace to replace them
with tree plantations. For example, a Norwegian timber company, Green
Resources Ltd, plans to replace almost 7,000 hectares of natural
Tanzanian grassland with monocultures of pine and eucalyptus.
* Promoting the use of agrofuels, which researchers are now saying
increase, not decrease greenhouse gas emissions.
* Harming lakes and rivers, the lifeblood of many African nations, and
possibly driving them to extinction. Waterways like the Niger River
have decreased by 10 percent in just 10 years. In Ethiopia, the
construction of a large dam and the irrigation of adjacent sugar
plantations will result in Kenya's Lake Turkana, the world's largest
desert lake, to drop by two meters in the first year, increasing
salinity levels, adversely impacting fish stocks, and condemning the
lake to a not-so-slow death.

These reports, as well as briefs on other aspects of land grabs, are
available at www.oaklandinstitute.org/special-investigation-two-land-deals-africa
.

###

The Oakland Institute is an independent policy think tank whose
mission is to increase public participation and promote fair debate on
critical social, economic and environmental issues.

www.oaklandinstitute.org

Become a Fan on Facebook: www.facebook.com/oak.institute

Follow us on Twitter: @oak_institute

To unsubscribe from this listserve, please send a message to info@oaklandinstitute.org
--
Anuradha Mittal
Executive Director
Mailing Address: The Oakland Institute, P.O. Box 18978, Oakland CA 94619
Physical Address: 4173 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 9, Oakland, CA 94619
Phone: 510-469-5228
www.oaklandinstitute.org

Become a Fan on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/oak.institute

Follow us on Twitter: @oak_institute


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Two summer internships available: China and Africa programs

Dear all,

Two additional internships are available this summer at International Rivers. Please forward to anyone you think may be interested.

******

China Program Education and Outreach Intern - Summer 2012
We are seeking an intern interested in capacity building and online communications to assist in the development of an overseas training program and other outreach projects for the China Program. A full internship description and application instructions can be found here

Africa Program Assistant - Summer 2012
We are seeking an intern that is passionate about environmental and social issues in Africa, and who possesses solid research, writing and communication skills. The intern will be assisting the Africa Program Director, and will most likely be based in Pretoria, South Africa. A full internship description and application instructions can be found here

******

Thank you,

Intern & Volunteer Coordinator
International Rivers

Dams of destruction threaten Mekong/Bangkok Post

http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/269392/dams-of-destruction-threaten-mekong

Dams of destruction threaten Mekong
� Published: 6/12/2011 at 12:00 AM
� Newspaper section: News, Bangkok Post
This week a decision will be made in Siem Reap, Cambodia, that could
shape the future of the mighty Mekong River and fundamentally alter
the lives of 60 million people.

The governments of Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam will meet
tomorrow and Thursday near the ancient temple of Angkor Wat, to
discuss the controversial Xayaburi Dam in Laos, which threatens to
become the first dam on the Lower Mekong River. Under a 1995 treaty,
the four governments must reach a consensus before any project can be
built on the Lower Mekong.

If Xayaburi is approved, it could open the floodgates for 10 more dams
to be built on the river. If all the projects are built, an estimated
55% of the Lower Mekong would be turned into a stagnant reservoir. The
world's largest inland fishery would be decimated by giant walls that
prevent millions of fish from migrating to their breeding grounds.
Farmers would lose access to the nutrients that the river carries down
from its upper reaches, and millions of people would lose access to
the fish that are an essential source of protein in their diets.

Politicians are scrambling to make sense of this dilemma. All major
geopolitical decisions have complicated tradeoffs. But with the
Xayaburi Dam, there is simply not enough information about what the
region's governments could be trading away.

Evidence so far points to the dam being a bad idea of historic
proportions. Because the impact would be irreversible, numerous
scientists have urged the governments to conduct more studies before
making a decision.

In the past year, two authoritative scientific investigations urged
caution and recommended further studies, but were quickly swept aside
by politicians.

In 2010, a strategic environmental assessment was completed for the
Mekong River Commission (MRC), the inter-governmental organisation
that manages the shared river. The report concluded that the 11
proposed dams on the Mekong River would likely cause "serious and
irreversible environmental damage" in all four countries, and
recommended a 10-year deferment while further scientific studies were
conducted.

The MRC, however, pushed this study aside. Instead of endorsing the
report, its website explained that the assessment is "not an official
MRC approved document".

Economists are also questioning whether the Mekong dams will really
bring about the growth that proponents claim.

In a 2011 study funded by the US Agency for International Development
(USAID), Portland State University questioned the assumptions that
regional policymakers used to calculate the costs and benefits of the
Mekong dams. The study concludes that the costs could significantly
outweigh the benefits (with a net negative cost of US$274 billion in
one scenario).

Many proponents of the Mekong dams, it seems, did not consider the
massive economic benefits generated by the river's fisheries and
ecosystems.

Meanwhile, Laos has distributed a quasi-scientific study to woo the
other governments into agreement. In May, Laos hired Swiss company
Poyry Energy to determine whether the Xayaburi Dam complies with the
governments' agreed criteria for Mekong dams.

The Poyry report recommends that the dam should be built, despite
identifying over 40 major scientific and technical studies that still
need to be completed.

The report falsely claims that any negative impact from the dam can be
fixed after construction begins _ an approach that is out of step with
all respected international practice.

This puts politicians in an awkward position. The legitimate concerns
of the strategic environmental assessment and the USAID-funded study
have been buried.

Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam (along with donor governments) instead
find themselves forced to spend time reviewing the Poyry report that
has already been widely dismissed as greenwash.

Vietnam and Cambodia have raised concerns about the Xayaburi Dam's
trans-boundary impact. While Thailand has also expressed concern with
the project, it is negotiating a deal to purchase 95% of the
electricity generated. No consensus has been reached.

Laos has capitalised on all of this indecisiveness, constructing roads
and work camps in the remote area where it wants to build the Xayaburi
Dam, and announcing plans to begin blocking the river by the end of
the year.

The official Xayaburi website boldly claims that Laos has a right to
move forward with the project, and that the project would not have any
negative environmental impact.

The Siem Reap meeting this week is not only a test for the Xayaburi
Dam, but a test for regional cooperation around the shared Mekong River.

The right thing for governments to do is to take a precautionary
approach and cancel the dam -- or at least commit to a 10-year
postponement on construction of dams along the Lower Mekong region, so
that further scientific studies can be conducted.

In either case, Laos will need to stop construction on the Xayaburi
Dam and cooperate in good faith.

Thailand will need to cancel plans to purchase electricity from the dam.

Donors, such as the United States, European and Australian
governments, could offer to fund the necessary scientific studies,
support a revision of the regional decision-making process, and urge
Laos to explore more reasonable development alternatives to Mekong dams.

This will take some uncomfortable conversations with Laos and
Thailand. The next few days will see some awkward diplomatic moments,
but the time has come for governments to take a bold stance against
the reckless damming of the Mekong River.

Kirk Herbertson works with International Rivers, a US-based non-profit
organisation that protects rivers and the rights of people who depend
on them.

http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/269392/dams-of-destruction-threaten-mekong
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: dams@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Monday, December 5, 2011

Env nod given to Tipaimukh project: PM

Env nod given to Tipaimukh project: PM
Press Trust of India / Imphal December 03, 2011, 18:09 IST
http://business-standard.com/india/news/env-nod-given-to-tipaimukh-project-pm/152200/on

Prime Minister Manmohon Singh today said that environmental clearance
had been given to the proposed Tipaimukh dam project on the River Barak
in Manipur to be funded by the World Bank.

Addressing a public meeting here, the Prime Minister said that the
forest clearance process for the project was underway. He urged the
concerned central ministries to actively pursue the funding with the
World Bank.

The 1500 mw joint venture Tipaimukh Hydro Electricity Project is
proposed to be constructed on the trijunction of Manipur, Mizoram and
Assam over the Barak river which originates in Manipur's Senapati district.

''In the power section, I have been informed that the 1500 MW Tipaimukh
Hydro Electricity Project will be executed by a joint venture company of
National Hydroelectric Power Corporation and the government of
Manipur,'' he said.

''I understand that a project for expansion and upgradation of power
transmission, sub transmission and distribution networks in the north
eastern states has been posed to the World Bank for funding. I am asking
the concerned central government ministries to pursue the matter
actively with the World Bank,'' the Prime Minister said.

Earlier, media reports had said that Bangladesh government had
reservations on the project as they had said it would affect their water
management.
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: sasia@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Policy Program Assistant - 2012 Summer Internship

Dear all,

Please note the available internship and forward to anyone you think may be interested:

Policy Program Assistant - 2012 Summer Internship
http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/7009

International Rivers is a non-profit analysis and advocacy organization with offices in the US, Brazil, Thailand, India, and South Africa. International Rivers supports communities around the world in protecting their rivers and rights. We work to halt destructive dams and encourage better methods of meeting needs for water, energy and protection from floods. We are seeking a Policy Program Assistant for Summer 2012 to help advance the goals of the Policy team around the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol.

Background

The Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol (HSAP) was prepared in an industry-led process from 2007 to 2010. The Protocol is a voluntary scorecard by which the hydropower industry can assess the social and environmental performance of its projects. Civil society groups from the Global South and dam-affected people were largely excluded from this process.

International Rivers and other civil society groups are currently calling on governments and other institutions not to support this document that can be used to greenwash destructive projects. The Policy Program Assistant will work with the Coordinator to make sure that HSAP does not replace or weaken existing social and environmental standards.

Specific responsibilities include:

  • Compiling a track record of dam builders' violations of international standards.
  • Build outreach and media databases to increase the exposure of the HSAP campaign.
  • Update the Policy Program web pages.
  • Assist the Policy Program Coordinator with other research, administrative, and campaign related activities when necessary.

Skills and experiences required:

  • Strong research, writing and communications skills.
  • Academic background in water policy (BA or MA level).
  • Ability to multitask, stay organized, work independently and within a team, and keep deadlines.
  • Excellent computer skills and attention to detail.

Desired qualifications:

  • Ideally fluent in both English and one of the following languages: Portuguese, Mandarin, French
  • Experience interacting with environmental NGOs.

This position will be based in our Berkeley, CA, office.

The Policy Program Assistant's work schedule requires an average of 15-20 hours per week and will run from May to July (start/end dates are flexible). Compensation will be $12/hour. Internship benefits also include the opportunity to deepen the individual's understanding of comparative international policy standards and guidelines.

Qualified applicants are encouraged to send a cover letter, 3-page writing sample, and resume to the Intern and Volunteer Coordinator, internship@internationalrivers.org, with the subject line: Policy Program Internship. NO CALLS, PLEASE. This internship posting will expire May 1, 2012.


Thank you,

Intern & Volunteer Coordinator
International Rivers