China's tourism plan quells Brahmaputra dam fears
By Ananth Krishnan
The Hindu
June 24, 2012
http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article3566337.ece
Chinese plans to build a major tourism project and national park in a
Tibetan county have dealt a blow to hydropower lobby groups who have
proposed the construction of massive dam on the Brahmaputra's �Great
Bend', where the river begins its course towards India.
The Chinese government announced on Saturday it had earmarked 400
million yuan ($63.5 million) to develop tourism in Nyingchi prefecture
in south-eastern Tibet. The plans include an ambitious proposal to raise
two billion yuan ($317.5 million) to build an "international tourism
town" in the border prefecture.
The "golden tourism" project in Nyingchi follows the opening of Tibet's
first national park in the same county in December in the Grand Canyon
of the Yarlung Zangbo river, as the Brahmaputra is known in Tibet.
The plans appear to signal the government's moves to develop the region
as a tourism hub, amid rising pressure from hydropower groups to tap the
enormous potential of the canyon and the �Great Bend', where the river
spectacularly falls over 1,000 metres.
A number of hydropower lobby groups have called on the central
government to give the green light for as many as 28 proposed dams on
the Yarlung Zangbo. China has, so far, only embarked on one hydropower
project, a run-of-the-river dam at Zangmu on the river's middle reaches
which officials say will not impact downstream flows.
Of particular concern to Indian officials was a proposal by Sinohydro,
an influential state-owned hydropower company, to build a massive
38-gigawatt project at Motuo near the �Great Bend', a dam that would
surpass even the Three Gorges project in scale. Environmental groups
have raised concerns about the plan's impact on both the sensitive
ecosystem of the region and on downstream flows.
Wang Songping, deputy chief of Tibet's regional tourism bureau, was
quoted as saying by state media that the national park at the Yarlung
Zangbo Grand Canyon would be run by a committee "responsible for
environmental protection", and would "follow an internationally-accepted
practice in its management of tourism resources and minimise harm to the
plateau ecology." The park stretches across several counties in Nyingchi
and Qamdo prefectures.
The plan for the park has disappointed hydropower groups pushing for the
projects. Zhang Boting, deputy secretary-general of the Chinese Society
of Hydropower Engineers, told The Hindu in an interview last year that a
dam on the �Great Bend' could save up to 100 million tonnes of coal. But
he did acknowledge there were technical barriers to putting in
equipment, with the river falling by over 1,000 metres over steep gorges.
India and China will this month discuss the issue of trans-border rivers
in a working group meeting. Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao told Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh during talks last week on the sidelines of the
Rio+20 summit that China was willing to strengthen communication with
India on the issue, and would share hydrological data.
Chinese officials have in talks sought to address Indian concerns over
long-discussed proposals to divert the Brahmaputra's waters, under the
western route of the massive south-to-north water diversion project.
Work on the central and middle routes, which divert water from the
Yangtse river to the arid north, is already in progress.
Chinese officials said on June 19, during a working conference on the
project, that "construction of the final west route, which is hampered
by difficulties of crossing the 3,000-5,000 metre-high Qinghai-Tibet
Plateau, is not yet scheduled to begin."
The Nyingchi tourism project, officials said, also will include 22
"model villages" built over three years at the cost of 100 million yuan
($15.8 million), where residents will provide family hotel services for
tourists. Indian officials rejected media reports which claimed the
tourism project in the border prefecture would have bearing on the
long-running boundary talks, pointing out that the relevant region was
not part of the dispute and was a region where India did not hold any
territorial claims.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: china@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
Monday, June 25, 2012
Thursday, June 21, 2012
FT: Nile dam: Water wars averted for now
June 19, 2012
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1f820ab2-b608-11e1-a511-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1yScB0PkJ
Nile dam: Water wars averted for now
By Katrina Manson
When Ethiopia�s plan to dam the Blue Nile grew grander within a month
of the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak, it did not go unnoticed
in his country, downstream, Nile-dependent Egypt.
The Grand Renaissance Dam, at 6,000MW, will be Africa�s largest
hydroelectric project.
�We have the right to develop our natural resource,� says Alemayehu
Tegenu, Ethiopia�s minister for water and energy.
�We were not benefiting much from the Nile. There is a group of people
who are totally against the dam and they are not right.�
Aside from some green lobbyists who fear the destruction of the
environment, he means Egypt.
Clinging to a colonial treaty signed in 1929, Egypt has veto rights
over any upstream developments that might affect the Nile�s flow.
A series of agreements sees neighbouring Sudan awarded 18.5bn cu
metres a year and 55bn cu metres for Egypt, even though Ethiopia is
the source for 85 per cent of the river and was left out of a later
1959 deal.
Meles Zenawi, Ethiopia�s prime minister, has long challenged �old-
fashioned ideas based on the assumption that the Nile water belongs to
Egypt�. Even so, the dam could deprive Egypt of more than 17bn cu
metres a year. The country relies on the river for 90 per cent of its
water.
�Ethiopia has pushed this through in a time of turmoil in Egypt,� says
an international official. �Egypt has not had the time or breathing
room to focus on it � the new leaders have not been able to unite the
country around a single issue and certainly not around the Nile.
�The guys in Addis have seen this opportunity and stepped right
through it. If Mubarak was still in power today, it would have been
the beginning of a water war,� says the official.
Mohamed Nasr El Din Allam, Egypt�s outgoing minister of water, says
the dam will create shortages in water, power and farming land and
lead to political, economic and social instability.
Ethiopia insists that its downstream neighbours Sudan and Egypt have
nothing to fear from its decision to dam the Blue Nile, which feeds
both countries. On the contrary, they will in fact both gain.
Mr Alemayehu says: �The dam will benefit both countries: it will not
reduce the flow, but regulate it. They will benefit because it will
reduce silt, control floods, regulate water flow throughout the
seasons.�
Sudan and Egypt have calmed their responses in the past year and a
technical committee has started work on an assessment of the dam�s
impact. The committee is expected to report next year, but Ethiopia is
not waiting. �We are allowing the establishment of the technical
committee so as to build confidence,� says Mr Alemayehu.
Costing an estimated $4.8bn and taking four years to build, it is the
sort of large-scale project that usually has donors and development
finance institutions rushing to help, glad to have a project in so
poor a country to spend their money on.
But they have not touched it. Instead, Ethiopian state television airs
nightly appeals to everyone from bus drivers to businessmen, to buy
bonds to support the project. Even political opposition figures are
buying bonds in what has become a national rallying cry.
�Meles is being very smart on this � it is a very expensive dam but it
is a transformative project,� says an international official. �I think
Ethiopia will deliver on the first 20 per cent of it and by then
donors will be rushing to come in.�
�Everyone is looking nervously to see how much progress there is,�
says the official. Sudan and Egypt must also face the likelihood that
the Ethiopian project sets a precedent, should other upstream
countries such as Uganda or South Sudan, on the White Nile, decide to
dam the river flow too.
Over the past two years, Uganda, Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda,
Burundi and Democratic Republic of Congo have all signed an agreement
to seek more water from the Nile, which they argue should be shared
more fairly, Egypt says the agreement does not overturn the 1929
agreement.
The Nile�s water wars may merely be on hold.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2012.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1f820ab2-b608-11e1-a511-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1yScB0PkJ
Nile dam: Water wars averted for now
By Katrina Manson
When Ethiopia�s plan to dam the Blue Nile grew grander within a month
of the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak, it did not go unnoticed
in his country, downstream, Nile-dependent Egypt.
The Grand Renaissance Dam, at 6,000MW, will be Africa�s largest
hydroelectric project.
�We have the right to develop our natural resource,� says Alemayehu
Tegenu, Ethiopia�s minister for water and energy.
�We were not benefiting much from the Nile. There is a group of people
who are totally against the dam and they are not right.�
Aside from some green lobbyists who fear the destruction of the
environment, he means Egypt.
Clinging to a colonial treaty signed in 1929, Egypt has veto rights
over any upstream developments that might affect the Nile�s flow.
A series of agreements sees neighbouring Sudan awarded 18.5bn cu
metres a year and 55bn cu metres for Egypt, even though Ethiopia is
the source for 85 per cent of the river and was left out of a later
1959 deal.
Meles Zenawi, Ethiopia�s prime minister, has long challenged �old-
fashioned ideas based on the assumption that the Nile water belongs to
Egypt�. Even so, the dam could deprive Egypt of more than 17bn cu
metres a year. The country relies on the river for 90 per cent of its
water.
�Ethiopia has pushed this through in a time of turmoil in Egypt,� says
an international official. �Egypt has not had the time or breathing
room to focus on it � the new leaders have not been able to unite the
country around a single issue and certainly not around the Nile.
�The guys in Addis have seen this opportunity and stepped right
through it. If Mubarak was still in power today, it would have been
the beginning of a water war,� says the official.
Mohamed Nasr El Din Allam, Egypt�s outgoing minister of water, says
the dam will create shortages in water, power and farming land and
lead to political, economic and social instability.
Ethiopia insists that its downstream neighbours Sudan and Egypt have
nothing to fear from its decision to dam the Blue Nile, which feeds
both countries. On the contrary, they will in fact both gain.
Mr Alemayehu says: �The dam will benefit both countries: it will not
reduce the flow, but regulate it. They will benefit because it will
reduce silt, control floods, regulate water flow throughout the
seasons.�
Sudan and Egypt have calmed their responses in the past year and a
technical committee has started work on an assessment of the dam�s
impact. The committee is expected to report next year, but Ethiopia is
not waiting. �We are allowing the establishment of the technical
committee so as to build confidence,� says Mr Alemayehu.
Costing an estimated $4.8bn and taking four years to build, it is the
sort of large-scale project that usually has donors and development
finance institutions rushing to help, glad to have a project in so
poor a country to spend their money on.
But they have not touched it. Instead, Ethiopian state television airs
nightly appeals to everyone from bus drivers to businessmen, to buy
bonds to support the project. Even political opposition figures are
buying bonds in what has become a national rallying cry.
�Meles is being very smart on this � it is a very expensive dam but it
is a transformative project,� says an international official. �I think
Ethiopia will deliver on the first 20 per cent of it and by then
donors will be rushing to come in.�
�Everyone is looking nervously to see how much progress there is,�
says the official. Sudan and Egypt must also face the likelihood that
the Ethiopian project sets a precedent, should other upstream
countries such as Uganda or South Sudan, on the White Nile, decide to
dam the river flow too.
Over the past two years, Uganda, Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda,
Burundi and Democratic Republic of Congo have all signed an agreement
to seek more water from the Nile, which they argue should be shared
more fairly, Egypt says the agreement does not overturn the 1929
agreement.
The Nile�s water wars may merely be on hold.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2012.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Behind every land grab is a water grab
(Excerpted from a GRAIN report; for full report see:
http://tinyurl.com/8436bth)
Africa: Squeezing Africa Dry - Behind Every Land Grab is a Water Grab
14 June 2012
.
Those who have been buying up vast stretches of farmland in recent years,
whether based in Dubai or London City, understand that it's the access to
water that they get from the land deals, which they often get for free and
without restriction, that may well be worth the most over the long-term.
"The value is not in the land," says Neil Crowder, whose UK-based company,
Chayton Capital, has been acquiring farmland in Zambia. "The real value is
in water."
And water is abundant in Africa, according to those behind the hundreds of
large farmland deals that have been signed across Africa. They say the
continent's water resources are vastly under-utilised, and they want to
harness them for their agriculture projects. But the reality is that a
third of Africans already live in water-scarce environments and climate
change is going to up these numbers significantly. A closer look at where
these deals are taking place and how much water they plan to consume shows
that the projects will rob millions of people of their access to water and
risk to deplete the continent's most precious fresh water sources.
WHEN THE NILE RUNS DRY....
Few countries in Africa have received more foreign interest in their
farmland than those served by the Nile River. The Nile, Africa's longest
river, is a lifeline especially for Egypt, Ethiopia, South Sudan, Sudan,
and Uganda, and already a source of significant geopolitical tensions
aggravated by the numerous large-scale irrigation projects that have been
undertaken in the region. Back in 1959, Great Britain brokered a colonial
deal that divided the water rights between Sudan (a bit) and Egypt (a
lot), and no one else. Massive irrigation schemes were built in both
countries to grow cotton for export to the UK. In the 1960s, Egypt built
the mighty Aswan Dam to regulate the flow of the Nile in Egypt and
increase irrigation possibilities. The dam achieved both, but it also
stopped the flow of nutrients and minerals that fertilised the downstream
soils of Egypt's farmers.
This economically, ecologically and politically fragile Nile basin is now
the target of a new wave of large-scale agriculture projects. Three of the
main countries in the basin, Ethiopia, South Sudan and Sudan have,
together, already leased out millions of hectares in the basin and are
offering more. To bring this land into production, all of it will need to
be irrigated. Ethiopia is the source of some 80% of the Nile water. In its
Gambela region on the border with South Sudan, corporations such as
Karuturi from India and Saudi Star from Saudi Arabia are already building
big irrigation channels that will massively increase Ethiopia's withdrawal
of water from the Nile. And these are just two of the actors involved. One
calculation suggests that if all the land that the country has leased out
is brought under production and irrigation it will increase the country's
use of freshwater resources for agriculture by a factor of nine.
Further downstream, in South Sudan and Sudan, some 4.9 million hectares of
land has been leased out to foreign corporations since 2006. That is more
than the size of the whole of the Netherlands. And further up north, Egypt
is also leasing out land and implementing its own new irrigation projects.
Of course, it remains to be seen how much of all this will actually be
brought into production and under irrigation, but it is difficult to
imagine that the Nile can handle this onslaught.
Reliable figures on how much irrigation is actually possible and
sustainable are difficult to find. The FAO, in various publications and in
its Aquastat database, gives figures on 'irrigation potential' and actual
irrigation by country and river basin. FAO establishes 8 million hectares
as the total 'maximum value' available for total irrigation in all 10
countries of the Nile basin. But the 4 countries mentioned above already
have irrigation infrastructure established for 5.4 million hectares and
have now leased out a further 8.6 million hectares of land where
irrigation will be developed.
THE NIGER, ANOTHER LIFELINE AT RISK
Another part of Africa targeted by agribusiness is the lands along the
Niger River, West Africa's biggest river. Mali, Niger and Nigeria are the
countries most dependent on the river, but seven other countries in the
Niger basin share its water. It is also extremely fragile as it has
suffered from man-made interventions such as dams, irrigation and
pollution. Water experts estimate that the volume of the Niger has shrunk
by one-third during the last three decades alone. Others indicate that the
river might lose another third of its flow as a consequence of climate
change.
In Mali, the river spreads out into a vast inland delta which constitutes
Mali's main agricultural zone and one of the region's most important
wetlands. It is here that the 'Office du Niger' is located and where many
of the land grabbing projects are concentrated. The Office du Niger
presides over the irrigation of over 70,000 ha, mainly for the production
of rice. It is the largest irrigation scheme in West Africa, and it uses a
substantial part of all the river's water, especially during the dry
season.
Back in the 1990s, the FAO put Mali's potential to irrigate from the Niger
at a bit over half a million ha. But now, due to increased water scarcity,
independent experts conclude that the whole of Mali has the water capacity
to irrigate only 250,000 ha. Yet the Malian government has already signed
away 470,000 ha to foreign companies from Libya, China, the UK, Saudi
Arabia and other countries in the past few years, and is offering much
more.
HYDRO-COLONIALISM?
The Nile and the Niger basins are just two of the areas where land and
water rights are massively being given away. The areas where land grabbing
is concentrated in Africa coincide almost completely with the continent's
largest river and lake systems, and in most of these areas irrigation is a
prerequisite of commercial production
The Ethiopian government is constructing a dam in the Omo River to
generate electricity and irrigate a huge sugar-cane plantation - a project
that threatens hundreds of thousands of indigenous people that depend on
the river further downstream. It also threatens to empty the world's
biggest desert lake, fed by the Omo River, Lake Turkana.
In Kenya, a tremendous controversy has arisen from the government's plans
to hand out huge areas of land in the delta of the Tana River with
disastrous implications for the local communities depending on the delta's
water.
The already degraded Senegal River basin and its delta have been subject
to hundreds of thousands of hectares in land deals, putting foreign
agribusiness in direct competition for the water with local farmers. The
list goes on and is growing by the day.
If this land and water grab is not put to an end, millions of Africans are
going to lose access to water sources which they need for their
livelihoods, as they are moved out of the areas where land/water deals
have been agreed to, or simply see the access to their traditional water
sources blocked by newly built fences, canals and dikes that are owned by
someone else.
There is simply not enough water in Africa's rivers and water tables to
provide irrigation for all of the large-scale agriculture projects that
foreign companies are pursuing. If and when they are put under production,
these 21st century industrial plantations will rapidly destroy, deplete
and pollute water sources across the continent. Such models of
agricultural production have generated enormous problems of soil
degradation, salinisation and water logging wherever they have been
applied.
Africa is in no shape for such an imposition. Over one in three Africans
live with water scarcity, and the continent's food production is set to
suffer more than any other from climate change. The advocates of the land
deals and mega-irrigation schemes argue that these big investments should
be welcomed as an opportunity to combat hunger and poverty in the
continent. But bringing in the bulldozers to plant water-demanding crops
for export can never be a solution to hunger and poverty.
If the goal is to increase food production, then there is ample evidence
that this can be most effectively done by building on the traditional
water management and soil conservation systems of local communities, and
by strengthening collective and customary rights over land and water
sources.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
http://tinyurl.com/8436bth)
Africa: Squeezing Africa Dry - Behind Every Land Grab is a Water Grab
14 June 2012
.
Those who have been buying up vast stretches of farmland in recent years,
whether based in Dubai or London City, understand that it's the access to
water that they get from the land deals, which they often get for free and
without restriction, that may well be worth the most over the long-term.
"The value is not in the land," says Neil Crowder, whose UK-based company,
Chayton Capital, has been acquiring farmland in Zambia. "The real value is
in water."
And water is abundant in Africa, according to those behind the hundreds of
large farmland deals that have been signed across Africa. They say the
continent's water resources are vastly under-utilised, and they want to
harness them for their agriculture projects. But the reality is that a
third of Africans already live in water-scarce environments and climate
change is going to up these numbers significantly. A closer look at where
these deals are taking place and how much water they plan to consume shows
that the projects will rob millions of people of their access to water and
risk to deplete the continent's most precious fresh water sources.
WHEN THE NILE RUNS DRY....
Few countries in Africa have received more foreign interest in their
farmland than those served by the Nile River. The Nile, Africa's longest
river, is a lifeline especially for Egypt, Ethiopia, South Sudan, Sudan,
and Uganda, and already a source of significant geopolitical tensions
aggravated by the numerous large-scale irrigation projects that have been
undertaken in the region. Back in 1959, Great Britain brokered a colonial
deal that divided the water rights between Sudan (a bit) and Egypt (a
lot), and no one else. Massive irrigation schemes were built in both
countries to grow cotton for export to the UK. In the 1960s, Egypt built
the mighty Aswan Dam to regulate the flow of the Nile in Egypt and
increase irrigation possibilities. The dam achieved both, but it also
stopped the flow of nutrients and minerals that fertilised the downstream
soils of Egypt's farmers.
This economically, ecologically and politically fragile Nile basin is now
the target of a new wave of large-scale agriculture projects. Three of the
main countries in the basin, Ethiopia, South Sudan and Sudan have,
together, already leased out millions of hectares in the basin and are
offering more. To bring this land into production, all of it will need to
be irrigated. Ethiopia is the source of some 80% of the Nile water. In its
Gambela region on the border with South Sudan, corporations such as
Karuturi from India and Saudi Star from Saudi Arabia are already building
big irrigation channels that will massively increase Ethiopia's withdrawal
of water from the Nile. And these are just two of the actors involved. One
calculation suggests that if all the land that the country has leased out
is brought under production and irrigation it will increase the country's
use of freshwater resources for agriculture by a factor of nine.
Further downstream, in South Sudan and Sudan, some 4.9 million hectares of
land has been leased out to foreign corporations since 2006. That is more
than the size of the whole of the Netherlands. And further up north, Egypt
is also leasing out land and implementing its own new irrigation projects.
Of course, it remains to be seen how much of all this will actually be
brought into production and under irrigation, but it is difficult to
imagine that the Nile can handle this onslaught.
Reliable figures on how much irrigation is actually possible and
sustainable are difficult to find. The FAO, in various publications and in
its Aquastat database, gives figures on 'irrigation potential' and actual
irrigation by country and river basin. FAO establishes 8 million hectares
as the total 'maximum value' available for total irrigation in all 10
countries of the Nile basin. But the 4 countries mentioned above already
have irrigation infrastructure established for 5.4 million hectares and
have now leased out a further 8.6 million hectares of land where
irrigation will be developed.
THE NIGER, ANOTHER LIFELINE AT RISK
Another part of Africa targeted by agribusiness is the lands along the
Niger River, West Africa's biggest river. Mali, Niger and Nigeria are the
countries most dependent on the river, but seven other countries in the
Niger basin share its water. It is also extremely fragile as it has
suffered from man-made interventions such as dams, irrigation and
pollution. Water experts estimate that the volume of the Niger has shrunk
by one-third during the last three decades alone. Others indicate that the
river might lose another third of its flow as a consequence of climate
change.
In Mali, the river spreads out into a vast inland delta which constitutes
Mali's main agricultural zone and one of the region's most important
wetlands. It is here that the 'Office du Niger' is located and where many
of the land grabbing projects are concentrated. The Office du Niger
presides over the irrigation of over 70,000 ha, mainly for the production
of rice. It is the largest irrigation scheme in West Africa, and it uses a
substantial part of all the river's water, especially during the dry
season.
Back in the 1990s, the FAO put Mali's potential to irrigate from the Niger
at a bit over half a million ha. But now, due to increased water scarcity,
independent experts conclude that the whole of Mali has the water capacity
to irrigate only 250,000 ha. Yet the Malian government has already signed
away 470,000 ha to foreign companies from Libya, China, the UK, Saudi
Arabia and other countries in the past few years, and is offering much
more.
HYDRO-COLONIALISM?
The Nile and the Niger basins are just two of the areas where land and
water rights are massively being given away. The areas where land grabbing
is concentrated in Africa coincide almost completely with the continent's
largest river and lake systems, and in most of these areas irrigation is a
prerequisite of commercial production
The Ethiopian government is constructing a dam in the Omo River to
generate electricity and irrigate a huge sugar-cane plantation - a project
that threatens hundreds of thousands of indigenous people that depend on
the river further downstream. It also threatens to empty the world's
biggest desert lake, fed by the Omo River, Lake Turkana.
In Kenya, a tremendous controversy has arisen from the government's plans
to hand out huge areas of land in the delta of the Tana River with
disastrous implications for the local communities depending on the delta's
water.
The already degraded Senegal River basin and its delta have been subject
to hundreds of thousands of hectares in land deals, putting foreign
agribusiness in direct competition for the water with local farmers. The
list goes on and is growing by the day.
If this land and water grab is not put to an end, millions of Africans are
going to lose access to water sources which they need for their
livelihoods, as they are moved out of the areas where land/water deals
have been agreed to, or simply see the access to their traditional water
sources blocked by newly built fences, canals and dikes that are owned by
someone else.
There is simply not enough water in Africa's rivers and water tables to
provide irrigation for all of the large-scale agriculture projects that
foreign companies are pursuing. If and when they are put under production,
these 21st century industrial plantations will rapidly destroy, deplete
and pollute water sources across the continent. Such models of
agricultural production have generated enormous problems of soil
degradation, salinisation and water logging wherever they have been
applied.
Africa is in no shape for such an imposition. Over one in three Africans
live with water scarcity, and the continent's food production is set to
suffer more than any other from climate change. The advocates of the land
deals and mega-irrigation schemes argue that these big investments should
be welcomed as an opportunity to combat hunger and poverty in the
continent. But bringing in the bulldozers to plant water-demanding crops
for export can never be a solution to hunger and poverty.
If the goal is to increase food production, then there is ample evidence
that this can be most effectively done by building on the traditional
water management and soil conservation systems of local communities, and
by strengthening collective and customary rights over land and water
sources.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
PR: G-20 Infrastructure Strategy Includes World’s Largest Dam
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Media contact:
Zachary Hurwitz, Policy Coordinator, International Rivers
zachary@internationalrivers.org +001 415 341 5264
G-20 Infrastructure Strategy Includes World=EF=BF=BDs Largest Dam
Report Says =EF=BF=BDGreen Growth=EF=BF=BD Projects May Not Benef= it Poor
Los Cabos, Mexico: G-20 leaders today released their Plan on Infrastructure, which recommends building what would be the world's largest hydropower scheme, the controversial Grand Inga Dam on the Congo River, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Civil society organization International Rivers immediately criticized inclusion of the project as neither inclusive nor green, stating that donors have already spent billions in aid dollars for dams and transmission projects on the Congo River, yet 94% of the country's population still has no access to electricity.
"The G-20 leaders should prioritize investments that directly address poor peoples' needs rather than using taxpayer money to pay for huge, high-risk projects whose private sector returns rarely trickle down. In sub-Saharan Africa, where water stress is highest, decentralized infrastructure has a better track record of providing water and electricity than do large storage dams, which can worsen poverty and reduce climate resilience, and are certainly not green," states Zachary Hurwitz, Policy Coordinator of International Rivers.
The organization=EF=BF=BDs new report, entitled Infrastructure fo= r Whom?, calls on the G-20 leaders to change course on the controversial infrastructure strategy. The report finds that large, centralized infrastructure such as Grand Inga more often benefits energy-intensive industries than it does poor people who seek increased access to electricity, water, and sanitation, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia BHP Billiton, Southern Africa=EF=BF=BDs leading aluminum producer, has expressed interest in the Grand Inga Dam.
A high-level report on infrastructure, prepared for the G-20 summit in Cannes, France last November, proposes using public spending to offset private sector risk for eleven large, regional infrastructure projects that it claims will boost economic growth while being environmentally-friendly, what the strategy calls =EF=BF=BDgreen growth.=EF=BF=BD
Yet, at least four of the recommended projects are in the hydropower and grid expansion sectors, which have traditionally suffered from high levels of risk, corruption, graft, and cost overruns.
Recent reports have signaled that new renewable technologies are approaching grid parity and will be more effective in meeting the world's energy needs. A 2010 World Bank report found that 65 million people in Africa will gain access to safe and clean lighting through solar by 2015, while a 2012 Bloomberg New Energy Finance report stated that grid-connected photovoltaics in Africa have already become competitive. The International Energy Agency has stated that the energy needs of 70% the world's rural poor could be met by investment in small, decentralized infrastructure technologies.
International Rivers' report finds that the majority of rural poor live closer to local sources of renewable energy and water than to an electric grid and centralized irrigation systems. As a result, decentralized projects that address the needs of the poor directly are more effective at promoting broad-based economic growth and reducing poverty than grid expansion and construction of centralized mega-projects. Small-scale energy and water projects can also strengthen climate resilience, reduce the social and environmental footprint of the infrastructure sector, and strengthen democratic control over essential public services.
Large infrastructure lending has regained focus as world leaders search for ways to stimulate growth. The World Bank has recently indicated it will return to large infrastructure lending, having issued its own new infrastructure strategy in 2011. International Rivers' report calls on Jim Yong Kim, who will take office as the World Bank's new President in July, to replace the institution's top-down approach to infrastructure with a strategy that prioritizes the needs of the poor.
The new report, Infrastructure for Whom?, is available at www.internationalrivers.org/infrastructureforwhom.
Hard copies can be requested from Kate Ross at kross@internati= onalrivers.org.
##
International Rivers is an environmental and human rights organization with staff in four continents. For over two decades, we have been at the heart of the global struggle to protect rivers and the rights of communities that depend on them.
2150 Allston Way, Suite 300, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
+1 510 848 1155 | info@internationalrivers.org | internationalrivers.org
facebook.com/InternationalRivers | twitter.com/IntlRivers
youtube.com/internationalrivers | pinterest.com/IntlRivers
Unsubscribe
Receive event invitations and campaign updates by email
Stop all email communication
Monday, June 18, 2012
Human Rts Watch: Lower Omo people suffering under irrigation, dam development
All,
HRW's latest report on Ethiopia: "What Will Happen if Hunger Comes?"
Abuses against the Indigenous People of Ethiopia's Lower Omo Valley
was released today in Kenya. The full report can be downloaded from:
http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/ethiopia0612webwcover.pdf
The press release follows.
Ethiopia: Pastoralists Forced off Their Land for Sugar Plantations
Government Should Consult, Compensate Indigenous Communities
June 18, 2012
(Nairobi) � The Ethiopian government is forcibly displacing indigenous
pastoral communities in Ethiopia�s Lower Omo valley without adequate
consultation or compensation to make way for state-run sugar
plantations, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. The
report contains previously unpublished government maps that show the
extensive developments planned for the Omo valley, including
irrigation canals, sugar processing factories, and 100,000 hectares of
other commercial agriculture.
The 73-page report, ��What Will Happen if Hunger Comes?�: Abuses
against the Indigenous Peoples of Ethiopia�s Lower Omo
Valley,�documents how government security forces are forcing
communities to relocate from their traditional lands through violence
and intimidation, threatening their entire way of life with no
compensation or choice of alternative livelihoods. Government
officials have carried out arbitrary arrests and detentions, beatings,
and other violence against residents of the Lower Omo valley who
questioned or resisted the development plans.
�Ethiopia�s ambitious plans for the Omo valley appear to ignore the
rights of the people who live there,� said Ben Rawlence, senior Africa
researcher at Human Rights Watch. �There is no shortcut to
development; the people who havelong relied on that land for their
livelihood need to have their property rights respected, including on
consultation and compensation.�
The Lower Omo valley, one of the most remote and culturally diverse
areas on the planet, is home to around 200,000 people from eight
unique agro-pastoral communities who have lived there for as long as
anyone can remember. Their way of life and their identity is linked to
the land and access to the Omo River. The Omo valley is in Ethiopia�s
Southern Peoples, Nations, and Nationalities Region (SNNPR), near the
border with Kenya, and was designated a UNESCO World Heritage site in
1980.
The significant changes planned for the Omo valley are linked to the
construction of Africa�s highest dam, the controversial Gibe III
hydropower project, along the Omo River. Downstream, the sugar
plantations will depend on irrigation canals. Although there have been
some independent assessments of the Gibe dam project, to date, the
Ethiopian government has not published any environmental or social
impact assessments for the sugar plantations and other commercial
agricultural developments in the Omo valley.
Human Rights Watch interviewed more than 35 residents in June 2011,
along with 10 donor officials and at least 30 other witnesses since
that time. At the time of Human Rights Watch�s visit, military units
regularly visited villages to intimidate residents and suppress
dissent related to the sugar plantation development. Soldiers
regularly stole or killed cattle.
�What am I going to eat?� a man of the Mursi ethnic group told Human
Rights Watch. �They said to take all my cattle and to sell them and to
only tie one up at my house. What can I do with only one? I am a
Mursi. If hunger comes I shoot a cow�s neck and drink blood. If we
sell them all for money how will we eat?�
The evidence gathered by Human Rights Watch since its visit
demonstrates that in the past year regional officials and security
forces have forcibly seized land from indigenous communities living
and farming within the areas slated for sugar production. Reports of
forced displacement and the clearing of agricultural land have
gathered pace.
Access to the Omo River is critical for the food security and way of
life of the pastoralists who live in the valley. Several community
representatives said that state officials had told them, without any
other discussion, that the communities would need to reduce the number
of their cattle and resettle in one place, and that they would lose
access to the Omo River.
As of June 2012, irrigation canals have been dug, land has been
cleared, and sugar production has begun along the east bank of the
river. Government maps photographed by Human Rights Watch indicate
that the area where sugar cultivation is under way is a fraction of
what is labeled as �Sugar Block One.� Two additional �blocks� of land
that will be taken for sugar cultivation are to follow. Ethiopia�s
existing assessments of the impact of the Gibe dam do not include the
impact of sugar cultivation and irrigation on the flow of the Omo
River, or the downstream impact on Lake Turkana. The massive network
of irrigation canals indicated on the maps suggests that the previous
assessments are insufficient.
The full implementation of the plan could affect at least 200,000
people in the Omo valley and another 300,000 Kenyans living across the
border around Lake Turkana, which derives up to 90 percent of its
water from the Omo River. Human Rights Watch said Kenya should press
for new environmental and social impact assessments that examine the
cumulative impact of the Gibe III dam and the irrigated commercial
agriculture scheme.
These developments � which threaten the economic, social, and cultural
rights of the Omo valley�s indigenous inhabitants � are being carried
out in contravention of domestic and international human rights
standards, which call for the recognition of property rights, with
meaningful consultation, consent, and compensation for loss of land,
livelihoods, and food security, and which state that displacement,
especially of indigenous peoples from their historic homelands, must
be treated as an absolute last resort.
The rights of indigenous peoples are addressed by Ethiopia�s own laws
and constitution, as well as the UN Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples and regional human rights treaties and mechanisms
such as the African human rights charter as interpreted by the African
Commission on Human and Peoples� Rights. Under these laws and
agreements, indigenous peoples have property rights over the land they
have historically occupied that must be recognized by the state, and
they can only be displaced with their free, prior, and informed
consent. Even when such consent is given, they must also be fully
compensated for any loss of land, property, or livelihood.
In fact, Ethiopia has not recognized any rights over the land of the
indigenous communities of the area, including tenure security, Human
Rights Watch found. Neither has it taken steps to adequately consult
with, let alone seek the consent of, the indigenous peoples of the Omo
valley, in particular taking into account the scant formal education
of most of the population.
The Ethiopian government has responded to concerns raised by Human
Rights Watch by noting that the plantations will bring benefits to the
indigenous populations in the form of employment. Employment may be a
welcome benefit for affected communities. But the prospect of some
jobs does not remove the urgent need for the government to suspend
plantation development until rigorous assessments have been carried
out, the rights of the indigenous communities over their land has been
recognized and consent sought, and any displacement or acquisition of
land is shown to be strictly necessary, proportionate, and
compensation provided, Human Rights Watch said.
Many international nongovernmental organizations have raised concerns
about potential social and environmental impacts of the Gibe III
hydropower project and have criticized the Ethiopian government for a
lack of transparency and independent assessment. The Ethiopian
government withdrew its request of the World Bank and African
Development Bank for financing of the Gibe dam project but has not
publicized its reasons for doing so. UNESCO�s World Heritage Committee
has recommended suspending the project pending further independent
evaluation of the effect on Lake Turkana.
The Ethiopian government relies on international aid for a significant
percentage of its budget. Security forces and officials from the
regional and district administrations are implementing the plans for
the sugar plantations and telling local residents they must move,
without any consultation or recognition of their rights. A multi-donor
funded program called Protection of Basic Services (PBS) provides
hundreds of millions of dollars to support health, education, and
other sectors and funds the salaries of district government officials
across Ethiopia, including SNNPR region. The main donors to PBS are
the World Bank, the United Kingdom, the European Union, the
Netherlands, and Germany.
Human Rights Watch called on the Ethiopian government to suspend the
construction of Gibe III and the associated sugar plantations until
these developments can be carried out in a manner consistent with
national laws and international human rights standards. The Ethiopian
government should recognize the rights of the Omo valley�s indigenous
communities over their historic homelands and engage in meaningful
discussion with them over the future use of their land and
compensation on that basis, prior to further industrial development in
South Omo. Donors should ensure their funding is not supporting forced
displacement or unlawful expropriation of indigenous lands, Human
Rights Watch said.
�Ethiopia�s desire to accelerate economic development is laudable, but
recent events in the Omo valley are taking an unacceptable toll on the
rights and livelihoods of indigenous communities,� Rawlence said. �The
government should suspend the process until it meets basic standards,
and donors should make sure their aid is not facilitating abuses.�
Selected Accounts from �What Will Happen if Hunger Comes�
�People disagree with the government on the sugar, but are afraid of
the possible use of force to resettle people and so do not say much.
[We have a] big fear of government here. If you express concern, you
go to jail.�
� Bodi man, June 2011.
�There will be a problem during the dry season. Now there is water,
but when there isn�t if we do not go back to Omo we will need
government to bring water. If they do not, [we] and our cattle will
die. We will go to Omo anyway, if not, we will die, they can kill us
there if they want.�
� Mursi villager, June 2011.
�What am I going to eat? They said to take all my cattle and to sell
them and to only tie one up at my house. What can I do with only one?
I am a Mursi. If hunger comes I shoot a cow�s neck and drink blood. If
we sell them all for money how will we eat? When we get married we
marry with cattle. What will we marry with? What will we eat? When
hunger comes what will we feed our children with? If we just keep
chickens will we eat soup or milk them�? �This land is my land,� say
the highland Ethiopians. �Run to the forest like a baboon.��
� Mursi man describing the importance of cattle, December 2011.
�They [the government officials] cleared out their [Kwegu and Bodi]
gardens. They cleared far and dug up their sorghum. The sorghum was
near ripening; a truck plowed it and cast it away. The Kwegu gardens
were plowed and some Kwegu are now without anything. If their sorghum
is plowed what are they going to eat? What will they give to their
kids?�
� Man describing what happened to Bodi and Kwegu farmland that was
cleared in December 2011.
�There will be big problems in the areas if all the cattle are given
to the government. What will these people eat, now the drought is
really badly affecting the Horn of Africa? Now the dam has been built,
no water in the river, land has been taken away, the cattle given to
the government, what will happen to the poor people in time of the
famine? Those people who want to wipe out the pastoralists eat three
times a day. What will happen if hunger comes?�
� Mursi man, May 2011.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
HRW's latest report on Ethiopia: "What Will Happen if Hunger Comes?"
Abuses against the Indigenous People of Ethiopia's Lower Omo Valley
was released today in Kenya. The full report can be downloaded from:
http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/ethiopia0612webwcover.pdf
The press release follows.
Ethiopia: Pastoralists Forced off Their Land for Sugar Plantations
Government Should Consult, Compensate Indigenous Communities
June 18, 2012
(Nairobi) � The Ethiopian government is forcibly displacing indigenous
pastoral communities in Ethiopia�s Lower Omo valley without adequate
consultation or compensation to make way for state-run sugar
plantations, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. The
report contains previously unpublished government maps that show the
extensive developments planned for the Omo valley, including
irrigation canals, sugar processing factories, and 100,000 hectares of
other commercial agriculture.
The 73-page report, ��What Will Happen if Hunger Comes?�: Abuses
against the Indigenous Peoples of Ethiopia�s Lower Omo
Valley,�documents how government security forces are forcing
communities to relocate from their traditional lands through violence
and intimidation, threatening their entire way of life with no
compensation or choice of alternative livelihoods. Government
officials have carried out arbitrary arrests and detentions, beatings,
and other violence against residents of the Lower Omo valley who
questioned or resisted the development plans.
�Ethiopia�s ambitious plans for the Omo valley appear to ignore the
rights of the people who live there,� said Ben Rawlence, senior Africa
researcher at Human Rights Watch. �There is no shortcut to
development; the people who havelong relied on that land for their
livelihood need to have their property rights respected, including on
consultation and compensation.�
The Lower Omo valley, one of the most remote and culturally diverse
areas on the planet, is home to around 200,000 people from eight
unique agro-pastoral communities who have lived there for as long as
anyone can remember. Their way of life and their identity is linked to
the land and access to the Omo River. The Omo valley is in Ethiopia�s
Southern Peoples, Nations, and Nationalities Region (SNNPR), near the
border with Kenya, and was designated a UNESCO World Heritage site in
1980.
The significant changes planned for the Omo valley are linked to the
construction of Africa�s highest dam, the controversial Gibe III
hydropower project, along the Omo River. Downstream, the sugar
plantations will depend on irrigation canals. Although there have been
some independent assessments of the Gibe dam project, to date, the
Ethiopian government has not published any environmental or social
impact assessments for the sugar plantations and other commercial
agricultural developments in the Omo valley.
Human Rights Watch interviewed more than 35 residents in June 2011,
along with 10 donor officials and at least 30 other witnesses since
that time. At the time of Human Rights Watch�s visit, military units
regularly visited villages to intimidate residents and suppress
dissent related to the sugar plantation development. Soldiers
regularly stole or killed cattle.
�What am I going to eat?� a man of the Mursi ethnic group told Human
Rights Watch. �They said to take all my cattle and to sell them and to
only tie one up at my house. What can I do with only one? I am a
Mursi. If hunger comes I shoot a cow�s neck and drink blood. If we
sell them all for money how will we eat?�
The evidence gathered by Human Rights Watch since its visit
demonstrates that in the past year regional officials and security
forces have forcibly seized land from indigenous communities living
and farming within the areas slated for sugar production. Reports of
forced displacement and the clearing of agricultural land have
gathered pace.
Access to the Omo River is critical for the food security and way of
life of the pastoralists who live in the valley. Several community
representatives said that state officials had told them, without any
other discussion, that the communities would need to reduce the number
of their cattle and resettle in one place, and that they would lose
access to the Omo River.
As of June 2012, irrigation canals have been dug, land has been
cleared, and sugar production has begun along the east bank of the
river. Government maps photographed by Human Rights Watch indicate
that the area where sugar cultivation is under way is a fraction of
what is labeled as �Sugar Block One.� Two additional �blocks� of land
that will be taken for sugar cultivation are to follow. Ethiopia�s
existing assessments of the impact of the Gibe dam do not include the
impact of sugar cultivation and irrigation on the flow of the Omo
River, or the downstream impact on Lake Turkana. The massive network
of irrigation canals indicated on the maps suggests that the previous
assessments are insufficient.
The full implementation of the plan could affect at least 200,000
people in the Omo valley and another 300,000 Kenyans living across the
border around Lake Turkana, which derives up to 90 percent of its
water from the Omo River. Human Rights Watch said Kenya should press
for new environmental and social impact assessments that examine the
cumulative impact of the Gibe III dam and the irrigated commercial
agriculture scheme.
These developments � which threaten the economic, social, and cultural
rights of the Omo valley�s indigenous inhabitants � are being carried
out in contravention of domestic and international human rights
standards, which call for the recognition of property rights, with
meaningful consultation, consent, and compensation for loss of land,
livelihoods, and food security, and which state that displacement,
especially of indigenous peoples from their historic homelands, must
be treated as an absolute last resort.
The rights of indigenous peoples are addressed by Ethiopia�s own laws
and constitution, as well as the UN Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples and regional human rights treaties and mechanisms
such as the African human rights charter as interpreted by the African
Commission on Human and Peoples� Rights. Under these laws and
agreements, indigenous peoples have property rights over the land they
have historically occupied that must be recognized by the state, and
they can only be displaced with their free, prior, and informed
consent. Even when such consent is given, they must also be fully
compensated for any loss of land, property, or livelihood.
In fact, Ethiopia has not recognized any rights over the land of the
indigenous communities of the area, including tenure security, Human
Rights Watch found. Neither has it taken steps to adequately consult
with, let alone seek the consent of, the indigenous peoples of the Omo
valley, in particular taking into account the scant formal education
of most of the population.
The Ethiopian government has responded to concerns raised by Human
Rights Watch by noting that the plantations will bring benefits to the
indigenous populations in the form of employment. Employment may be a
welcome benefit for affected communities. But the prospect of some
jobs does not remove the urgent need for the government to suspend
plantation development until rigorous assessments have been carried
out, the rights of the indigenous communities over their land has been
recognized and consent sought, and any displacement or acquisition of
land is shown to be strictly necessary, proportionate, and
compensation provided, Human Rights Watch said.
Many international nongovernmental organizations have raised concerns
about potential social and environmental impacts of the Gibe III
hydropower project and have criticized the Ethiopian government for a
lack of transparency and independent assessment. The Ethiopian
government withdrew its request of the World Bank and African
Development Bank for financing of the Gibe dam project but has not
publicized its reasons for doing so. UNESCO�s World Heritage Committee
has recommended suspending the project pending further independent
evaluation of the effect on Lake Turkana.
The Ethiopian government relies on international aid for a significant
percentage of its budget. Security forces and officials from the
regional and district administrations are implementing the plans for
the sugar plantations and telling local residents they must move,
without any consultation or recognition of their rights. A multi-donor
funded program called Protection of Basic Services (PBS) provides
hundreds of millions of dollars to support health, education, and
other sectors and funds the salaries of district government officials
across Ethiopia, including SNNPR region. The main donors to PBS are
the World Bank, the United Kingdom, the European Union, the
Netherlands, and Germany.
Human Rights Watch called on the Ethiopian government to suspend the
construction of Gibe III and the associated sugar plantations until
these developments can be carried out in a manner consistent with
national laws and international human rights standards. The Ethiopian
government should recognize the rights of the Omo valley�s indigenous
communities over their historic homelands and engage in meaningful
discussion with them over the future use of their land and
compensation on that basis, prior to further industrial development in
South Omo. Donors should ensure their funding is not supporting forced
displacement or unlawful expropriation of indigenous lands, Human
Rights Watch said.
�Ethiopia�s desire to accelerate economic development is laudable, but
recent events in the Omo valley are taking an unacceptable toll on the
rights and livelihoods of indigenous communities,� Rawlence said. �The
government should suspend the process until it meets basic standards,
and donors should make sure their aid is not facilitating abuses.�
Selected Accounts from �What Will Happen if Hunger Comes�
�People disagree with the government on the sugar, but are afraid of
the possible use of force to resettle people and so do not say much.
[We have a] big fear of government here. If you express concern, you
go to jail.�
� Bodi man, June 2011.
�There will be a problem during the dry season. Now there is water,
but when there isn�t if we do not go back to Omo we will need
government to bring water. If they do not, [we] and our cattle will
die. We will go to Omo anyway, if not, we will die, they can kill us
there if they want.�
� Mursi villager, June 2011.
�What am I going to eat? They said to take all my cattle and to sell
them and to only tie one up at my house. What can I do with only one?
I am a Mursi. If hunger comes I shoot a cow�s neck and drink blood. If
we sell them all for money how will we eat? When we get married we
marry with cattle. What will we marry with? What will we eat? When
hunger comes what will we feed our children with? If we just keep
chickens will we eat soup or milk them�? �This land is my land,� say
the highland Ethiopians. �Run to the forest like a baboon.��
� Mursi man describing the importance of cattle, December 2011.
�They [the government officials] cleared out their [Kwegu and Bodi]
gardens. They cleared far and dug up their sorghum. The sorghum was
near ripening; a truck plowed it and cast it away. The Kwegu gardens
were plowed and some Kwegu are now without anything. If their sorghum
is plowed what are they going to eat? What will they give to their
kids?�
� Man describing what happened to Bodi and Kwegu farmland that was
cleared in December 2011.
�There will be big problems in the areas if all the cattle are given
to the government. What will these people eat, now the drought is
really badly affecting the Horn of Africa? Now the dam has been built,
no water in the river, land has been taken away, the cattle given to
the government, what will happen to the poor people in time of the
famine? Those people who want to wipe out the pastoralists eat three
times a day. What will happen if hunger comes?�
� Mursi man, May 2011.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Land grabs leave Africa facing ‘hydrological suicide’ - report
http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/land-grabs-leave-africa-facing-hydrological-suicide-report
Land grabs leave Africa facing �hydrological suicide� - report
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:13 GMT
Source: alertnet // Emma Batha
By Emma Batha
LONDON (AlertNet) - A scramble for cheap African farmland by foreign
investors threatens to leave millions of people without water and
could ultimately drain the continent's rivers, a report warns.
"If these land grabs are allowed to continue, Africa is heading for a
hydrological suicide," said the report�s co-author Henk Hobbelink,
coordinator of GRAIN, an organisation supporting small farmers.
Foreign governments and wealthy individuals are snapping up millions
of hectares of land on the continent for large-scale agriculture
projects to grow food and biofuels for export.
But the report warns there is simply not enough water in Africa's
rivers and water tables to irrigate all the newly acquired land.
In some cases communities are already being moved off land to make way
for these mega-projects. In others, the plantations will divert water
from rivers that local people depend on for their own farming and
everyday needs.
"Millions of Africans are in danger of losing access to the water
sources they rely on for their livelihoods and for the survival of
their communities," Hobbelink said.
�The worst case scenario is indeed we end up with a situation where
the entire continent�s river systems will dry out.�
Hobbelink said the land deals � many of them along the Nile and Niger
rivers - were already creating tensions in some parts and could fuel
conflict.
Countries leasing land include Sudan, South Sudan, Ethiopia, Egypt,
Zambia, Kenya Tanzania, Mali and Senegal.
The report, Squeezing Africa dry: behind every land grab is a water
grab, said those acquiring farmland knew that the access to water they
were automatically gaining � often without restriction - could well be
worth more in the long term than the land deals themselves.
Agriculture already sucks up around 70 percent of freshwater used
globally. But demand is likely to soar as the world population
increases.
Investors come from India, Saudi Arabia, China, UAE, Libya, Qatar, the
United States, Britain, France and Canada among others, according to
GRAIN.
But the report said Africa was in no position to support these massive
new agribusiness projects - one in three Africans already lives with
water scarcity and climate change will make things worse.
Hobbelink also pointed out that in many parts of Africa there were
distinct dry and rainy seasons and local communities had adapted their
farming methods to suit these fluctuations. But he said many crops
being farmed on the new plantations, including rice, sugar cane and
palm oil, required huge amounts of water all year round.
POVERTY
Much investor interest is focused on countries in the Nile basin. The
United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) has estimated
the ten countries in the basin have enough water to irrigate a maximum
of 8 million hectares.
But four countries alone � Sudan, South Sudan, Ethiopia and Egypt -
have already established irrigation infrastructure for 5.4 million
hectares and leased out a further 8.6 million hectares.
Tensions have already flared over one project in Gambela in Ethiopia.
The plantation, owned by Saudi-based billionaire Mohammed Al-Amoudi,
is irrigated by water diverted from the Alwero River which locals
depend on for fishing and farming.
In April an armed group ambushed Al-Amoudi�s Saudi Star development
operations, leaving five people dead, according to GRAIN's report.
Advocates of land deals and irrigation projects say these big
investments in Africa should be hailed as an opportunity to tackle
hunger and poverty. But Hobbelink said people were being paid as
little as 70 cents a day to work on projects.
�Virtually all the land use we�ve seen is about installing huge
plantations and removing people from their territories," he added.
�It�s more about creating poverty than helping to address it.�
Hobbelink said the key to ending poverty was to invest in and improve
on local technologies and methods for managing and conserving water.
�We think the current drive for land-grabbing, as we call it - which
is what we think it is, has to be stopped,� he added.
GRAIN's report comes ahead of the Rio+20 summit on sustainable
development. Water will be one of the key topics under discussion when
the meeting opens on June 20.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
Land grabs leave Africa facing �hydrological suicide� - report
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:13 GMT
Source: alertnet // Emma Batha
By Emma Batha
LONDON (AlertNet) - A scramble for cheap African farmland by foreign
investors threatens to leave millions of people without water and
could ultimately drain the continent's rivers, a report warns.
"If these land grabs are allowed to continue, Africa is heading for a
hydrological suicide," said the report�s co-author Henk Hobbelink,
coordinator of GRAIN, an organisation supporting small farmers.
Foreign governments and wealthy individuals are snapping up millions
of hectares of land on the continent for large-scale agriculture
projects to grow food and biofuels for export.
But the report warns there is simply not enough water in Africa's
rivers and water tables to irrigate all the newly acquired land.
In some cases communities are already being moved off land to make way
for these mega-projects. In others, the plantations will divert water
from rivers that local people depend on for their own farming and
everyday needs.
"Millions of Africans are in danger of losing access to the water
sources they rely on for their livelihoods and for the survival of
their communities," Hobbelink said.
�The worst case scenario is indeed we end up with a situation where
the entire continent�s river systems will dry out.�
Hobbelink said the land deals � many of them along the Nile and Niger
rivers - were already creating tensions in some parts and could fuel
conflict.
Countries leasing land include Sudan, South Sudan, Ethiopia, Egypt,
Zambia, Kenya Tanzania, Mali and Senegal.
The report, Squeezing Africa dry: behind every land grab is a water
grab, said those acquiring farmland knew that the access to water they
were automatically gaining � often without restriction - could well be
worth more in the long term than the land deals themselves.
Agriculture already sucks up around 70 percent of freshwater used
globally. But demand is likely to soar as the world population
increases.
Investors come from India, Saudi Arabia, China, UAE, Libya, Qatar, the
United States, Britain, France and Canada among others, according to
GRAIN.
But the report said Africa was in no position to support these massive
new agribusiness projects - one in three Africans already lives with
water scarcity and climate change will make things worse.
Hobbelink also pointed out that in many parts of Africa there were
distinct dry and rainy seasons and local communities had adapted their
farming methods to suit these fluctuations. But he said many crops
being farmed on the new plantations, including rice, sugar cane and
palm oil, required huge amounts of water all year round.
POVERTY
Much investor interest is focused on countries in the Nile basin. The
United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) has estimated
the ten countries in the basin have enough water to irrigate a maximum
of 8 million hectares.
But four countries alone � Sudan, South Sudan, Ethiopia and Egypt -
have already established irrigation infrastructure for 5.4 million
hectares and leased out a further 8.6 million hectares.
Tensions have already flared over one project in Gambela in Ethiopia.
The plantation, owned by Saudi-based billionaire Mohammed Al-Amoudi,
is irrigated by water diverted from the Alwero River which locals
depend on for fishing and farming.
In April an armed group ambushed Al-Amoudi�s Saudi Star development
operations, leaving five people dead, according to GRAIN's report.
Advocates of land deals and irrigation projects say these big
investments in Africa should be hailed as an opportunity to tackle
hunger and poverty. But Hobbelink said people were being paid as
little as 70 cents a day to work on projects.
�Virtually all the land use we�ve seen is about installing huge
plantations and removing people from their territories," he added.
�It�s more about creating poverty than helping to address it.�
Hobbelink said the key to ending poverty was to invest in and improve
on local technologies and methods for managing and conserving water.
�We think the current drive for land-grabbing, as we call it - which
is what we think it is, has to be stopped,� he added.
GRAIN's report comes ahead of the Rio+20 summit on sustainable
development. Water will be one of the key topics under discussion when
the meeting opens on June 20.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
China sets 2012 hydro targets for rural areas
China sets 2012 hydro targets for rural areas
Interfax China
June 7, 2012
http://www.interfax.cn/news/20356
Shanghai. June 7. INTERFAX-CHINA - China plans to add three gigawatts
(GW) of small-scale hydropower plants in rural areas by the end of the
year, state media Technology and Science Daily reported Wednesday.
As of the end of 2011, there were some 45,151 hydropower projects with
62 GW of installed capacity operating in China's rural areas, which
generated 175.7 terawatt hours (TWh) of electricity last year, the
Ministry of Water Resources (MWR) was quoted as saying in the report.
Roughly half of China's small-scale installed hydro capacity is located
in Yunnan, Sichuan, Guangdong and Fujian provinces, said the ministry.
The MWR stressed the importance of hydropower for China's future energy
portfolio at the National Rural Hydropower Workshop in Beijing last
month. As the country diversifies its energy mix in an attempt to reduce
consumption of fossil fuels, small-scale hydro projects in rural areas
will become an evermore important source of electricity, said the ministry.
Small-scale hydropower projects � typically smaller than 10 megawatts
(MW) � are attractive because they are relatively inexpensive and cause
less environmental damage than large-scale facilities such as the Three
Gorges Dam, industry expert Liu Liye told Interfax today.
Liu noted that water resources in rural areas of west and northeast
China remain largely unexploited and offer potential for future
expansion in coming years.
China's 230 GW of installed hydropower capacity make it the world's
largest hydroelectric power user, according to statistics released by
the National Energy Administration in April.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: china@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
Interfax China
June 7, 2012
http://www.interfax.cn/news/20356
Shanghai. June 7. INTERFAX-CHINA - China plans to add three gigawatts
(GW) of small-scale hydropower plants in rural areas by the end of the
year, state media Technology and Science Daily reported Wednesday.
As of the end of 2011, there were some 45,151 hydropower projects with
62 GW of installed capacity operating in China's rural areas, which
generated 175.7 terawatt hours (TWh) of electricity last year, the
Ministry of Water Resources (MWR) was quoted as saying in the report.
Roughly half of China's small-scale installed hydro capacity is located
in Yunnan, Sichuan, Guangdong and Fujian provinces, said the ministry.
The MWR stressed the importance of hydropower for China's future energy
portfolio at the National Rural Hydropower Workshop in Beijing last
month. As the country diversifies its energy mix in an attempt to reduce
consumption of fossil fuels, small-scale hydro projects in rural areas
will become an evermore important source of electricity, said the ministry.
Small-scale hydropower projects � typically smaller than 10 megawatts
(MW) � are attractive because they are relatively inexpensive and cause
less environmental damage than large-scale facilities such as the Three
Gorges Dam, industry expert Liu Liye told Interfax today.
Liu noted that water resources in rural areas of west and northeast
China remain largely unexploited and offer potential for future
expansion in coming years.
China's 230 GW of installed hydropower capacity make it the world's
largest hydroelectric power user, according to statistics released by
the National Energy Administration in April.
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: china@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)