Wednesday, July 13, 2011

China's assessment calls for Burma's Myitsone Dam to be scrapped

China's assessment calls for Burma's Myitsone Dam to be scrapped

China Power Investment Corporation is forging ahead with its
controversial Myitsone dam in northern Burma despite its own assessment
calling for the project to be cancelled.

The 945-page "environmental impact assessment," fully funded by China�s
CPI Corporation and conducted by a team of Burmese and Chinese
scientists, recommends that the Irrawaddy Myitsone Dam not proceed.
"There is no need for such a big dam to be constructed at the confluence
of the Irrawaddy River" says the assessment.

CPI is planning to build and operate seven mega dams on the Irrawaddy
and its tributaries. According to the assessment the dams will impact
millions that depend on the river and threaten biodiverse ecosystems:
"The fragmentation of the Irrawaddy River by a series of dams will have
serious social and environmental problems not only at upstream of dams
but also very far downstream to the coastal area."

Last month fighting broke out between the Kachin Independence
Organization and the Burma Army near China's Dapein Dams, also in
Burma's northern Kachin State. An estimated 30,000 people have been
displaced.

Mega dams in Kachin State and Burma are deeply unpopular and numerous
appeals to Chinese companies and government to stop the dams have gone
unanswered. CPI's own assessment warned that "the majority of local
races oppose construction of the dams" and called for consultation with
and consent of affected peoples.

Although finished in late 2009, the assessment has never been made public.

"Chinese companies are increasing their investments in Burma yet they
are not following their own standards" said Sai Sai, coordinator of the
Burma Rivers Network. "While CPI Corporation is hiding its assessment
from the people of Burma, construction of the dams is speeding ahead."

The study also recommends a full social impact assessment be conducted
along the length of the whole river but this has not happened.

Contact: Sai Sai (+66) 884154386, Ah Nan (+66) 848854154

To read the full assessment please visit www.burmariversnetwork.org
________________________________________________

This is International Rivers' mailing list on China's global footprint, and particularly Chinese investment in
international dam projects.

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: chinaglobal@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Sustainable Hydropower – Ethiopian Style

Sustainable Hydropower – Ethiopian Style
By Peter Bosshard
July 13, 2011

[You will find the original text of this commentary with all links to
background documents at www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/6719. A more
general comment on the human rights obligation of business enterprises
and the response of the dam industry just appeared at
www.commondreams.org/view/2011/07/13-8.]

At the end of June, Reeyot Alemu, an Ethiopian journalist, was thrown
into jail after she dared to raise questions about the proposed Grand
Millennium Dam. This is only the latest example of the severe repression
that the Ethiopian government metes out against anybody who takes a
critical position on its massive hydropower projects. In spite of such
repression, the International Hydropower Association recently recognized
Ethiopia's power utility as a "Sustainability Partner." This is a
telling example of the dam industry's current propaganda effort – an
effort that is at best naive and at worst cynical.

Ethiopia is rich in rivers, geothermal and solar energy. Given the
country's huge needs and limited resources, the government would be well
advised to follow a rational planning process and mobilize all forces of
society as it develops its energy resources. Yet Ethiopia's energy
sector is utterly politicized. The government has pulled multi-billion
dollar projects such as the Gibe III Dam on the Omo River and the Grand
Millennium Dam on the Blue Nile out of thin air. It stitched up both
projects with an Italian company that received big no-bid contracts for
them – without comprehensive evaluation, a public debate, or notifying
its partners in the Nile Basin Initiative.

Ethiopia's politicized approach to hydropower is underpinned by severe
repression. Dam-affected people, academics and journalists cannot afford
to question government pet projects such as Gibe III and the Grand
Millennium Dam. A detailed report by Human Rights Watch documents how
the Ethiopian regime uses development projects to systematically
suppress critical voices. "Ethiopia's practices include jailing and
silencing critics and media, enacting laws to undermine human rights
activity, and hobbling the political opposition," the report states. As
if to drive home the point, several farmers and a journalist who wanted
to provide input into the report were detained. The ripples of this
repression have even reached our office, as we have received death
threats and other abuse for our efforts to stop the destructive Gibe III
Dam.

A few months ago, the Ethiopian government and the International
Hydropower Association (IHA) organized an international conference in
Addis Ababa under the motto of Hydropower for Sustainable Development.
The sponsors included China's Sinohydro, the World Bank, and the
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. In spite of the event's
alluring motto, Ethiopia's Prime Minister Meles Zenawi did not mince his
words. In a blistering opening statement, he condemned activists who
opposed dam projects as "hydropower extremists" and "bordering on the
criminal." The government's thugs will know how to take care of people
whom the Prime Minister has branded as "extremists."

Industry representatives, including from the IHA, have in the past
spoken out against death threats to civil society activists, and I
respect them for this. Yet the IHA has not expressed any concerns about
the human rights abuses in Ethiopia's hydropower sector, and has not
answered our questions on the subject. On the day after Prime Minister
Zenawi lashed out against environmental activists, the organization
embraced the government's power utility as a "Sustainability Partner."
The IHA and its-co-organizers also announced the establishment of a
"centre of excellence on sustainable hydropower" in Ethiopia.

I am not opposed to dialogue with repressive regimes if it brings about
measurable progress for human rights and the environment. But you need a
long spoon to sup with the devil, and define clear rules if you partner
with repressive regimes. The IHA has not done so. Dam builders don't
have to fulfill any social or environmental minimum standards for
becoming its "Sustainability Partners." All they have to do is assess
one of their projects under the dam industry's new Hydropower
Sustainability Assessment Protocol over the next three years, and pay
the IHA a fee of 65,000 Pounds. As we explain elsewhere, they can hire
their own evaluators and control the process when their projects undergo
assessments. Irrespective of the outcome, the IHA plans to give their
projects a "Sustainable Hydropower" logo at the end of the process.

The new Protocol foresees that affected people and civil society experts
can provide input when projects get assessed. Anybody who gives critical
feedback when a project is evaluated in Ethiopia will risk landing in
jail or worse. Yet such real-life impacts don't seem to matter in the
brave new world of the IHA's propaganda initiative. By going through the
motions of the new Protocol and paying a fee to the hydropower industry,
the Ethiopian dam builders can greenwash their image in an international
arena while silencing critics like Reeyot Alemu at home. The notion of
sustainability has often been mistreated, but has rarely come so cheap.
Yet partnerships cut both ways. With bedfellows like the Ethiopian dam
builders, the IHA has put its own legitimacy on the line.

Peter Bosshard is the policy director of International Rivers. He blogs
at www.internationalrivers.org/en/blog/peter-bosshard and tweets
@PeterBosshard.
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Ethiopia Moves Forward with Massive Nile Dam Project/Nat. Geo

(Apologies for cross postings)

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/07/110713-/ethiopia-south-sudan-nile-dam-river-water/

Ethiopia Moves Forward with Massive Nile Dam Project

by Ker Than

for National Geographic News

Published July 13, 2011

[This article is part of a special National Geographic news series and
initiative on global water issues.]

Ethiopia has announced that it will construct a controversial
multibillion-dollar Nile River dam that could supply more than 5,000
megawatts of electricity for itself and its neighbors, including
newcomer South Sudan.

The project�the Grand Millennium Dam�has sparked worries about
environmental and human costs and is refocusing attention on the
country�s troubled history with large dams.

(Read more about South Sudan�s energy situation in National
Geographic's Great Energy Challenge Blog: �Building a New Nation and
New Energy in South Sudan.�)

At a public ceremony in March, Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi
laid the cornerstone for the new dam, a hydroelectric power plant that
will span a section of the Blue Nile River in the country�s
Benishangul-Gumuz region.

The Blue Nile originates in Ethiopia�s Lake Tana and is one of two
major tributaries of the Nile, the world�s longest river.

(Read about the Blue Nile in National Geographic magazine.)

When completed in 2015, the Grand Millennium Dam will be the largest
hydroelectric power plant in Africa. It will also create the country's
largest artificial lake, with a capacity of 63 billion cubic meters of
water�twice the size of Lake Tana in Ethiopia�s Amhara region.

In late June, Ethiopia announced that it would build four additional
dams on the Blue Nile that will work in conjunction with the Grand
Millennium Dam to generate more than 15,000 megawatts of electricity.

The cost of the four new dams has not been disclosed, but the Grand
Millennium Dam is estimated to cost about $4.7 billion.

Power Hub

Ethiopia has stated that it wants to become a major power hub for
Africa by generating hydropower electricity that it can sell to its
neighbors, and the country is in a unique position to succeed.

"They call Ethiopia the water tower of Africa," said climatologist
Chris Funk of the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB). "If
you look at an elevation map of the continent, it's all pretty low
except for the Ethiopia highlands. So you have these big high
mountains that get a ton of rainfall and so the potential for
hydropower is pretty massive."

This potential has not been lost on the Ethiopian government.
According to environmental group International Rivers, Ethiopia has
more than 20 dams that are either currently operating or under
construction�more than any other African nation.

Ethiopia's government says the bulk of the Nile dams' generated
electricity will be exported to neighboring countries, but Egypt and
Northern Sudan have expressed concern that the mega dam project could
seriously reduce the downstream water flow of the Nile River in their
countries.

Conservationists also are worried about the Grand Millennium Dam's
environmental impacts. To date, no environmental impact assessment
report, or EIA, for the project has been published and the country has
not indicated that any studies are planned.

This isn't surprising, said International Rivers spokesperson Lori
Pottinger.

An EIA report that Ethiopia released in 2009 for Gibe III�another
large dam project on the country's Omo River that is currently under
construction�was widely criticized as flawed and inadequate and led
the World Bank, European Investment Bank, and the African Development
Bank to pull out of the project in 2010.

(Read more about plans to dam Ethiopia�s Omo River in National
Geographic magazine, on the National Geographic NewsWatch blog, and on
National Geographic�s freshwater website.)

Ethiopia may be seeking to avoid a similar public backlash with the
Grand Millennium Dam, but the lack of an EIA report has made it
difficult to raise international funds for the project, Pottinger said.

Troubled Waters

Ethiopia also has a troubled history of large dam projects that does
not inspire confidence. The country�s dams have been linked to the
controversial government practice of "land grabs."

The Ethiopian government, which owns all land in the country, has been
pushing tribal people off their ancestral lands and is leasing large
tracts of land to foreign interests, critics say.

"The government has already initiated extensive agricultural
irrigation schemes . . . for private corporations and the government,
forcing large numbers of the indigenous population out of these
agricultural and livestock grazing lands," said Claudia Carr, a
professor of international rural resource development at the
University of California, Berkeley.

"Since they have nowhere to go for alternative survival, armed
conflicts in the region are sharply rising,." Carr added.

According to a 2009 Africa Resources Working Group (ARWG) report, the
Gibe III dam could reduce the level of Lake Turkana by as much as 66
feet (20 meters) and affect as many as half a million people living in
Ethiopia and Kenya.

Such a drastic drop in water level would not only threaten wildlife in
the region�including hippopotamus, crocodiles, and migrant waterfowl�
but it would also increase the lake�s salinity because the salt
concentration in the lake increases as the water level drops, Carr said.

(See photos of aquatic species.)

"Lake Turkana is already just borderline potable for humans and
livestock,� she added. �An increase in salinity would push conditions
over this limit, as well as disrupt the entire biology of the lake
itself.�

Charging Ahead

Despite its difficulty in soliciting foreign funds, the government of
Ethiopia has said it is committed to the Grand Millennium Dam and that
it plans to fund the project without foreign aid by selling bonds to
the public.

�The Ethiopian population has agreed to build the Grand Millennium
Dam. All workers are giving one month salary, traders are buying
bonds, the diaspora is contributing to the dam,� Ethiopian government
spokesperson Haji Ibsa Gendo told Bloomberg News earlier this year.

But even if the Grand Millennium and Gibe III dams are successfully
completed, it's still unclear who will buy their electricity.

According to the Sudan Tribune, Ethiopia has "initial agreements" to
export electricity to Sudan, Dijibouti, and Kenya. But dam critics say
the majority of Africans are not connected to the power grid, and that
Ethiopia will be generating far more electricity than it or its
neighbors currently need.

"It's anyone's guess how they're going to sell off this electricity,"
Pottinger said.

News reports indicate that South Sudan could also be a potential buyer
of Ethiopia�s electricity, but the situation is complicated by a 1929
agreement that gives Egypt and Sudan rights over all of the Nile�s
water�an agreement that would now presumably include South Sudan and
which Ethiopia and several other African nations are challenging.

�Currently Sudan has a relatively large chunk of rights to the Nile
and it�s unclear how those are going to be divided, who they�re going
to side with, and what they�re going to want from Ethiopia,� Pottinger
said. �I don�t think anybody can guess what�s going to happen at this
point.�

Climate Change

There is also a danger that some of Ethiopia's dams will become
obsolete in a few decades as climate changes driven by global warming
alter hydrological cycles across eastern Africa.

One set of climate analyses, by UCSB's Funk and his colleagues,
predicts that southern Ethiopia could experience as much as a 20
percent decline in rainfall in the coming decades as a result of
changing climate patterns. If this happens, it could threaten the
electricity production of Gibe III and other dams on the Omo River.

"Whether you believe my analysis of why the rainfall is declining,
certainly the observation suggests the decline is happening. You can
be an unbeliever in climate change and still be concerned that the
rainfall is going down," Funk said.

According to International River's Pottinger, no dams in Ethiopia are
being analyzed for the potential impacts of climate change.

"This region of East Africa is already extremely dependent on
hydropower," she said.

"When you combine that with the fact that Africa is the continent that
is supposed to be most affected by climate change, that's just a
recipe for disaster."
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: dams@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Ethiopia Moves Forward with Massive Nile Dam Project/Nat. Geo

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/07/110713-/ethiopia-south-sudan-nile-dam-river-water/

Ethiopia Moves Forward with Massive Nile Dam Project

by Ker Than

for National Geographic News

Published July 13, 2011

This article is part of a special National Geographic news series and
initiative on global water issues.

Ethiopia has announced that it will construct a controversial
multibillion-dollar Nile River dam that could supply more than 5,000
megawatts of electricity for itself and its neighbors, including
newcomer South Sudan.

The project�the Grand Millennium Dam�has sparked worries about
environmental and human costs and is refocusing attention on the
country�s troubled history with large dams.

(Read more about South Sudan�s energy situation in National
Geographic's Great Energy Challenge Blog: �Building a New Nation and
New Energy in South Sudan.�)

At a public ceremony in March, Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi
laid the cornerstone for the new dam, a hydroelectric power plant that
will span a section of the Blue Nile River in the country�s
Benishangul-Gumuz region.

The Blue Nile originates in Ethiopia�s Lake Tana and is one of two
major tributaries of the Nile, the world�s longest river.

(Read about the Blue Nile in National Geographic magazine.)

When completed in 2015, the Grand Millennium Dam will be the largest
hydroelectric power plant in Africa. It will also create the country's
largest artificial lake, with a capacity of 63 billion cubic meters of
water�twice the size of Lake Tana in Ethiopia�s Amhara region.

In late June, Ethiopia announced that it would build four additional
dams on the Blue Nile that will work in conjunction with the Grand
Millennium Dam to generate more than 15,000 megawatts of electricity.

The cost of the four new dams has not been disclosed, but the Grand
Millennium Dam is estimated to cost about $4.7 billion.

Power Hub

Ethiopia has stated that it wants to become a major power hub for
Africa by generating hydropower electricity that it can sell to its
neighbors, and the country is in a unique position to succeed.

"They call Ethiopia the water tower of Africa," said climatologist
Chris Funk of the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB). "If
you look at an elevation map of the continent, it's all pretty low
except for the Ethiopia highlands. So you have these big high
mountains that get a ton of rainfall and so the potential for
hydropower is pretty massive."

This potential has not been lost on the Ethiopian government.
According to environmental group International Rivers, Ethiopia has
more than 20 dams that are either currently operating or under
construction�more than any other African nation.

Ethiopia's government says the bulk of the Nile dams' generated
electricity will be exported to neighboring countries, but Egypt and
Northern Sudan have expressed concern that the mega dam project could
seriously reduce the downstream water flow of the Nile River in their
countries.

Conservationists also are worried about the Grand Millennium Dam's
environmental impacts. To date, no environmental impact assessment
report, or EIA, for the project has been published and the country has
not indicated that any studies are planned.

This isn't surprising, said International Rivers spokesperson Lori
Pottinger.

An EIA report that Ethiopia released in 2009 for Gibe III�another
large dam project on the country's Omo River that is currently under
construction�was widely criticized as flawed and inadequate and led
the World Bank, European Investment Bank, and the African Development
Bank to pull out of the project in 2010.

(Read more about plans to dam Ethiopia�s Omo River in National
Geographic magazine, on the National Geographic NewsWatch blog, and on
National Geographic�s freshwater website.)

Ethiopia may be seeking to avoid a similar public backlash with the
Grand Millennium Dam, but the lack of an EIA report has made it
difficult to raise international funds for the project, Pottinger said.

Troubled Waters

Ethiopia also has a troubled history of large dam projects that does
not inspire confidence. The country�s dams have been linked to the
controversial government practice of "land grabs."

The Ethiopian government, which owns all land in the country, has been
pushing tribal people off their ancestral lands and is leasing large
tracts of land to foreign interests, critics say.

"The government has already initiated extensive agricultural
irrigation schemes . . . for private corporations and the government,
forcing large numbers of the indigenous population out of these
agricultural and livestock grazing lands," said Claudia Carr, a
professor of international rural resource development at the
University of California, Berkeley.

"Since they have nowhere to go for alternative survival, armed
conflicts in the region are sharply rising,." Carr added.

According to a 2009 Africa Resources Working Group (ARWG) report, the
Gibe III dam could reduce the level of Lake Turkana by as much as 66
feet (20 meters) and affect as many as half a million people living in
Ethiopia and Kenya.

Such a drastic drop in water level would not only threaten wildlife in
the region�including hippopotamus, crocodiles, and migrant waterfowl�
but it would also increase the lake�s salinity because the salt
concentration in the lake increases as the water level drops, Carr said.

(See photos of aquatic species.)

"Lake Turkana is already just borderline potable for humans and
livestock,� she added. �An increase in salinity would push conditions
over this limit, as well as disrupt the entire biology of the lake
itself.�

Charging Ahead

Despite its difficulty in soliciting foreign funds, the government of
Ethiopia has said it is committed to the Grand Millennium Dam and that
it plans to fund the project without foreign aid by selling bonds to
the public.

�The Ethiopian population has agreed to build the Grand Millennium
Dam. All workers are giving one month salary, traders are buying
bonds, the diaspora is contributing to the dam,� Ethiopian government
spokesperson Haji Ibsa Gendo told Bloomberg News earlier this year.

But even if the Grand Millennium and Gibe III dams are successfully
completed, it's still unclear who will buy their electricity.

According to the Sudan Tribune, Ethiopia has "initial agreements" to
export electricity to Sudan, Dijibouti, and Kenya. But dam critics say
the majority of Africans are not connected to the power grid, and that
Ethiopia will be generating far more electricity than it or its
neighbors currently need.

"It's anyone's guess how they're going to sell off this electricity,"
Pottinger said.

News reports indicate that South Sudan could also be a potential buyer
of Ethiopia�s electricity, but the situation is complicated by a 1929
agreement that gives Egypt and Sudan rights over all of the Nile�s
water�an agreement that would now presumably include South Sudan and
which Ethiopia and several other African nations are challenging.

�Currently Sudan has a relatively large chunk of rights to the Nile
and it�s unclear how those are going to be divided, who they�re going
to side with, and what they�re going to want from Ethiopia,� Pottinger
said. �I don�t think anybody can guess what�s going to happen at this
point.�

Climate Change

There is also a danger that some of Ethiopia's dams will become
obsolete in a few decades as climate changes driven by global warming
alter hydrological cycles across eastern Africa.

One set of climate analyses, by UCSB's Funk and his colleagues,
predicts that southern Ethiopia could experience as much as a 20
percent decline in rainfall in the coming decades as a result of
changing climate patterns. If this happens, it could threaten the
electricity production of Gibe III and other dams on the Omo River.

"Whether you believe my analysis of why the rainfall is declining,
certainly the observation suggests the decline is happening. You can
be an unbeliever in climate change and still be concerned that the
rainfall is going down," Funk said.

According to International River's Pottinger, no dams in Ethiopia are
being analyzed for the potential impacts of climate change.

"This region of East Africa is already extremely dependent on
hydropower," she said.

"When you combine that with the fact that Africa is the continent that
is supposed to be most affected by climate change, that's just a
recipe for disaster."
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Decentralized energy: Let The Little Light Shine

http://www.npr.org/2011/07/12/137786684/foreign-policy-let-the-little-light-shine

Foreign Policy: Let The Little Light Shine
by Charles Kenny

July 12, 2011
Charles Kenny is a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development
and a Schwartz fellow at the New America Foundation.

After nearly a decade of donor efforts, it is fair to say
Afghanistan's electricity sector remains a mess. This fact was
highlighted in a New York Times op-ed last week by Glenn Zorpette, the
editor of an electrical engineering journal, who chronicled a three-
year U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) struggle to
build a diesel power plant outside Kabul. Zorpette notes that the
plant, finally completed, often sits idle because the cost of trucking
fuel into the country makes the electricity six times the price of
power imported from neighboring states. Surveys of businesses suggest
that electricity customers in Afghanistan see 20 outages a month on
average and that seven out of 10 firms own a generator because
networked power is unreliable or just unavailable.

But USAID should look on the sort-of-bright side: For once, this is a
problem that has little to do with the particular curses of
Afghanistan or the failings of its occupiers. The electricity sector
is a multibillion-dollar muddle across much of the developing world,
where utilities with limited reach, poor service, and a tendency to
hemorrhage money are the norm. The answer in Afghanistan, as well as
in these other dimly lit places, is to move away from the current
model of provision � that of a centralized government-run monopoly �
toward competitive services by small-scale providers. And with the
help of technology, the latter option is becoming a widespread
reality. Think of it as the "microgrid" model.

Perhaps 20 percent of rural low-income populations in developing
countries have access to electricity, and rates are even worse in
rural and urban Africa. Even for those near a power line, often the
only way to get service is to pay off utility workers. For the average
firm in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, about 10 percent of the money
set aside for paying various bribes goes to keeping the lights on and
the water running. And for those lucky enough to have a supply, the
quality of networked power is grim. Looking at developing countries as
a whole, business surveys suggest that 40 percent of firms see
electricity supply as a major constraint to doing business, each firm
suffers an average of nine power outages a month, and nearly a third
of firms own a generator to provide backup power � or even as their
main source of electricity.

Behind these statistics lies a political calculus. The lucky few who
are already connected to power grids � as you might guess, they tend
to be the rich elite � would rather not pay very much for their power.
And under the status quo they don't have to: Prices are often set very
low to favor current customers, if they pay at all. In Bangladesh,
only about 55 percent of generated power is paid for. Of the missing
45 percent, perhaps 15 to 18 percent is accounted for by what the
industry calls "true technical" losses; the rest goes to illegal
connections or underbilling accounts. A 1994 survey suggests that
electricity revenues in developing countries average only about 60
percent of costs. Starved of financing, state electric utilities can't
roll out decent service to the bulk of the country. About a third of
utilities in Africa and South Asia can't even keep up with their own
basic operations and maintenance.

That means that 80 percent of Africans, for example, are left relying
on more expensive, less efficient, and unhealthier alternatives. Poor
people overwhelmingly use wood or dung for cooking and candles or
kerosene for lighting. They waste time collecting fuel and money
buying kerosene, suffer respiratory conditions and burns, produce far
more greenhouse gas emissions per unit of heat or light than more
efficient technologies, and get dim lighting and unreliable cooking
heat � all at a far, far higher price per unit of energy than the most
expensive electricity.

But where the state utility is too beholden to an urban elite, private
providers can fill the gap. A World Bank survey of 49 countries from a
few years ago found that 7,000 small-scale private companies, serving
communities of less than 50,000 people, were already responsible for
meeting the electricity needs of between 10 million and 50 million
households. In Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Cambodia, they
accounted for more than a third of all electricity connections in the
country.

Private providers usually charge far more than the state-run utility
for electricity. In Cambodia, for example, the government utility
already charges some of the highest tariffs in the world, averaging 16
cents a kilowatt-hour � but the small-scale providers charge double
that or more. On the other hand, they actually deliver what they
promise, providing power to homes that would otherwise be unconnected.
Given time and a friendly business environment, some small-scale
providers could even grow big enough to benefit from economies of
scale that still exist for traditional power plants (larger fossil-
fueled plants are more efficient than small ones). But even if they
don't, they'll still be lowering the real cost of energy for the
people who need it most.

And technology is making small-scale provision, and even self-
provision, an ever more attractive option. As the prices for solar
panels drop � they are down 60 percent since 2009 � it becomes
possible for many households to be electrically self-sufficient. In
India, a panel costs about $300, the same as a year's supply of
kerosene for a lamp. One panel can provide lighting; add another and
you can power a TV. Off-grid solar might be generating as much as 200
megawatts in India by 2013, enough to power more than 30 million
standard LED light bulbs. And India is part of a worldwide trend:
According to a recent U.N. report, developing countries as a whole
spent $72 billion on renewable energy in 2010, more than developed
countries invested. And about a third of worldwide renewable
investments were small-scale.

It is true that private participation in the electricity sector has a
decidedly mixed record in developing countries. In some cases, public
utilities have contracted with private firms to build plants and
generate power, deals that have often proved financially ruinous and
been tainted with corruption. But an approach that bypasses government
altogether, with private firms or even individual households
responsible for both generation and distribution, should be able to
steer clear of these problems. And an exhaustive 2009 study carried
out by staff at the World Bank found that private-sector participation
in electricity has led to an increase in quality of services, in part
because private providers have the incentive to ensure they get paid
for the services they deliver.

All in all, giving poor people the opportunity to pay full price for
electricity through local provision will be good for poverty, the
economy, and the environment. People will get reliable, modern power
that extends working and studying hours, and that power will be safer
and cleaner than energy produced from a range of technologies that
involve burning stuff invented between the Stone Age and the 1850s.
Donors like USAID would do well to support the new microgrid model �
and leave the unreformed and perhaps unreformable state power
behemoths to their fates.
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: dams@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

Monday, July 11, 2011

For First Time, Developing Countries Spending Most On Renewables

http://www.fastcompany.com/1765952/more-spent-on-renewable-energy-in-developing-countries-than-in-developed-economies-for-first

For The First Time, Developing Countries Spending The Most On
Renewables
BY Michael J. Coren


Spending on renewable energy is at an all-time high around the world,
and in some of the poorest places on Earth, it may mean leapfrogging
over dirty power sources in favor of clean ones.
That's it folks. 2010 may have been the year when developing countries
pulled away from the developed world's fossil-fuel fouled past, toward
a future powered by clean renewables. And despite the fact that much
of that investment was state-subsidized, we are still at a turning
point when renewables such as solar, geothermal and wind (those old
whipping posts for critics arguing they won't compete with subsidized
oil and coal) began to stand on their own two feet, especially in the
parts of the world where they are often the only source of power
available.

According to a new report by UN Environment Program, collaborating
with the Frankfurt School of Finance & Management and Bloomberg New
Energy Finance, investors poured a record $211 billion into renewable
energy in 2010, accounting for one-third of all new generating
capacity. That's a 540% rise since 2004, and during a global financial
crisis.

A big chunk of this investment was for massive wind farms in China
(the country's clean-tech sector swallowed up $48 billion last year)
and small-scale solar rooftops in Germany. Both are recipients of
largess from governments through feed-in tariffs and subsidies. Yet
the far more interesting story is the explosion of alternative energy
in places that can't afford such schemes, where the natural resource
base (wind, sun and geothermal) is vast and the cost of generating
clean energy is at or near competitive prices: Egypt, Morocco, Kenya,
Argentina, Mexico and others. Even Pakistan-- Pakistan!--took in $1.5
billion investment to boost its wind capacity.

"In many parts of the world, we could expect something like a leapfrog
[of energy technologies]," writes Ulf Moslener of the Frankfurt School
of Finance & Management in the report. "The strong message is
growth... Fossil fuel investment is still dominant around the world
but the gap is shrinking fast. If you look at the deals being made,
much of the [conventional] investment is to replace old fossil plants,
but renewable finance is for new capacity."

Assuming cold-hard numbers are an indication--presumably they are--we
are fast approaching a world where new energy resource bases will rely
substantially on strong winds, blazing sun and hot springs. Investment
in Kenya's wind, geothermal, small-scale hydro and biofuel projects
rocketed from virtually zero to $1.3 billion between 2009 and 2010.
Although only 10% of the country's population has access to
electricity, Kenya is building a 280 megawatt geothermal plant as a
down payment on the 3,000 MW it expects to need by 2018, roughly
triple today's demand.

In the Middle East and North Africa, Egypt and Morocco are teaming up
with the World Bank to create a series of massive solar installations
that will reshape the power dynamics of the region. Already, more than
600 megawatts (MW) of hybrid gas-solar plants have been installed.
Morocco announced its design to install 2,000 MW of solar capacity on
36 square miles before the decade is out (potentially for export to
Europe), while Egypt is planing to build its own 100 MW solar plant.

Renewables may still prove more expensive for some time to come. But
economics change fast. If today's trends are point to the future (the
price of PV solar per megawatt has dropped 60% since mid-2008), then
there's no turning back.

[Image: Flickr user whiteafrican]

Follow @fastcompany.
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp

River's decreasing flow alarms Congolese

River's decreasing flow alarms Congolese

By JUAKALI KAMBALE in Kinshasa
Posted Wednesday, July 6 2011 at 19:26

http://www.africareview.com/News/Decreasing+River+flow+alarms+Congolese/-/979180/1195882/-/11hkv3uz/-/index.html
The River Congo waters have drastically decreased in the first six
months of the year, causing problems for boat navigation.

According to the DRC public company in charge of the waterways - R�gie
des Voies Fluviales - the phenomenon is unprecedented in DRC history.

�We are about to declare a state of emergency if the situation lasts
and worsens,� said company chairman Benjamin Mukulungu.

In the months of May, June and July, the southern part of the DRC
experiences its dry season. And it is winter season in the rest of
southern Africa, when the weather is generally cold and dry.

However, the weather in the South African region should not explain
the sharp decrease of the Congo waters. According to Congolese
meteorologist Amos Paluku, the low water level is linked to other
climatic changes observed in the country, particularly in the western
DRC.

�People should bear in mind that fresh water is extremely precarious
even if Congolese people are used to seeing so much waters in their
environment. This year, water levels are very low in the River Congo.
This should be considered as a serious warning,� says Mr Paluku.

The River Congo is the backbone of the national economy. From Katanga
province in south-eastern DRC, the river enters the Atlantic Ocean,
after crossing seven of the country�s 11 provinces.

Several points

Mr Mukulungu, describes the river as the �wet nurse� of the entire
country as it is central to the transportation system.

Nowadays, lots of sandbanks are observed at several points of the
river and these prevent boats from berthing alongside the quays. Only
the major quays, such as Kinshasa�s, are accessible throughout the
seasons as they are regularly maintained.

�Our main concern, as a board of the waterways company, is not
necessarily the decreasing of waters in the river. The real problem is
the lack of maintenance equipment for dredging the sandbanks so as to
allow boats to navigate safely and freely,� Mr Mukulungu said.

Acting DRC minister of Transportation Martin Kabwelulu said that the
government was aware of these concerns.

�The government is doing its best to get a dredging boat for the River
Congo. This should be done within the coming three months,� the
minister assured.

The low water affects not only the transportation on the River Congo,
but also the functioning of the Inga dam downstream, in Bas-Congo
province. Inga is the biggest power-generating dam in the entire
country.

The 4,700km River Congo course benefits from the supply of many
important tributaries located in the rainy regions of eastern DRC such
as rivers Kasai, Ubangi, Aruwimi and Lukuga.
________________________________________________

You received this message as a subscriber on the list: africa@list.internationalrivers.org

To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp