Write to Authorities: Save Agriculture in Narmada Valley
Demand exclusion of canal network from irrigated villages
Narmada valley is facing yet another crisis beyond the gigantic dams, which has
arisen due to the huge canal network of the Indira Sagar and Omkareshwar
canals. The canals of these two ams are not yet fully planned, yet certain
estimates, which are not yet final by the Narmada Valley Development Authority
show that not less than 10,000 hectares of agricultural land is to be acquired,
but a larger acquisition is yet to come up in numerous villages, where even a
basic socio-economic survey of the affected land and families is yet to be
undertaken.
The worst part is that a major part of the canals; from main to minors is to
pass through villages on the Narmada river bank, which fall in the fully
irrigated region where there is no need or surface canal irrigation. The canals
are to be excavated and destroy huge tracts of fertile lands, for 20 mts to 100
mts wide canals. Prime agricultural lands, with 3-4 crops in a year is being
acquired, by applying the urgency clause or even other with illegalities in the
acquisition process, thus depriving thousands of farmer-families their lone
source of livelihood in this entire belt.
The lands and / or houses of many of the families are already affected by the
Sardar Sarovar and Maheshwar dams and the canals would cause further
displacement. The land to be excavated is rich block cotton soil and situated
in the directly draining catchment of Sardar Sarovar, which would result in
heavy siltation.
Serious Agro-Environmental Violations and Non-compliance:
It is notable that despite clearances to the ISP and OSP having been issued in
1987 and 1993, the command area development plans for the two Projects are not
yet final and approved by the central authorities after 15-20 years and there
is no optimum execution of the CAD works, reflecting the pari passu principle,
which is critical and pre-conditional. The High Court of M.P. after detailed
consideration of various issues pertaining to lack of planning and execution of
the environmental and rehabilitation measures directed in its judgement of
November 2009 that there shall no further land acquisition, excavation and
canal construction until the Devender Pandey Experts Committee of MoEF
scrutinizes and approves the CAD Plans of GoMP.
After the GoMP went in appeal to the Supreme Court against this Judgement, the
Court directed a temporary and conditional vacation of the stay granted by the
High Court on 25-02-2010, directing the same Expert Committee to approve the
CAD Plans within six weeks and requiring MoEF to take a decision on the basis
of the Committee's Report in the next four weeks.
The Expert Committee has given a clear finding and conclusion in its Report of
April 2010 that the said CAD Plans are neither complete nor final in terms of
the environmental clearances and stipulations and therefore, the same cannot be
approved. However, decision-making on behalf of the MoEF has been inordinately
delayed and the Ministry provided an additional period of 4 weeks to the GoMP
to comment on the Expert Committee Report. Pandey Committee has made a scathing
indictment of NVDA response, accusing it of making self-contradictory and
misleading statements. The Committee has also recommended that the Hon'ble
Apex Court must withdraw its earlier order lifting the High Court's stay.
There has thus been total violation and contempt of the Supreme Court' order
as well.
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh had also directed that the the canal network
must be reviewed to exclude the irrigated lands in order to protect
agriculture, minimize displacement and save the state exchequer. However there
has been gross disregard of this directive and thousands of hectares of land
are being acquired, while there is no need for canals in the irrigated belt at
all.
Violation of the Rehabilitation of the Canal-Affected:
After the canal-affected farmers challenged the lack of planning and
application of the Rehabilitation Policy to the canal-oustees, the High Court
directed in November 2009 that all the farmers must be entitled to all
entitlements under the R&R Policy, including land. However, to this date there
is very poor planning, availability of data and land to be offered in
rehabilitation and the same has also been proved before the R&R Sub Group.
Narmada Control Authority is directed to monitor implementation of R&R for the
canal-affecetd, which is yet to obtain full data and compliance from NVDA.
Before the Supreme Court also, NVDA had argued fiercely that the oustees should
not be entitled to rehabilitation. However, the Court, rejected this stance and
directed, as an interim measure (reserving the rights of other oustees) that
those farmers losing 60% or more land should be offered land in the vicinity of
the village or in the command area as the second option. If this is also not
possible, land from the land bank must be offered, after making it cultivable
and with provision of civic amenities. There has been total contempt of this
order also. NVDA has brought out a Circular misinterpreting this Order and has
also not provided cultivable land, as per the Order to a single oustee. It is
only trying to offer uncultivable, rocky or encroached land from the land bank.
Some oustees who have lost 80-100% of land in some adivasi villages have not
even been issued any notices till date.
It is in this context that there is an urgent need for an early decision-making
towards halting work on the Indira Sagar and Omkareshwar canals, land
acquisition process for which is continuing at break-neck speed, replete with
illegalities, making the entire process irreversible. This is one of the most
important and critical issues in the Narmada valley today, if thousands and
thousands of hectares of fertile agricultural land are to be saved from
permanently destruction in the name of the canals. The demand of the people
and the movement is not against the entire canal network per se. But at least
the canals need not and should not be brought into the irrigated areas where
the farmers and adivasis already have a secure and sustainable livelihood.
Please challenge non-complaince and contempt of both these Orders mentioned
above and the Judgement of the High Court.
WRITE TO THE CONCERNED AUTHORITIES DEMANDING THAT:
There must be no land acquisition, excavation and canal work until all
the environmental safeguard measures including command area development as laid
down in the clearances and various guidelines are fully planned and executed,
in an optimum manner, reflecting the pari passu principle and until
rehabilitation of all the oustees is planned and ensured, with land and
livelihood.
MoEF must immediately take a decision on the Pandey Committee's
Appraisal Report and issue stop-work notice to the ISP-OSP Canals.
NVDA must identify and allocate cultivable agricultural land to all the
canal-oustees as per the R&R Policy and also ensure other entitlements.
WRITE TO THE FOLLOWING AUTHORITIES:
Dr. Jairam Ramesh
Hon'ble Minister
Ministry of Environment and Forests,
Paryavaran Bhavan,
CGO Complex,
Lodhi Road, New Delhi
Fax: 011-24362222 / 24361727
E-mail:jairam54@gmail.com
Shri Mukul Wasnik
Hon'ble Minister
Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment Shastri Bhavan, Rajendra Prasad
Road New Delhi
Fax: 011-23381902/23381390
E-mail:m_wasnik@hotmail.com
min-sje@nic.in
Shri Shivraj Singh Chauhan, Chief Minister,
Madhya Pradesh
Fax: 0755-2551781, 0755-2540501 ; E-mail:cm@mp.nic.in
________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: sasia@list.internationalrivers.org
To be removed from the list, please visit:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2486/unsubscribe.jsp
No comments:
Post a Comment