Hindustan Times, February 12, 2013
The news that China is planning to build three more dams on the Yarlung
Tshangpo (as Siang, the main tributary of the Brahmaputra is known in
Tibet) has lead to a fresh interest in the issue. Before I elaborate,
here are some facts: out of Brahmaputra's total catchment area of
5,80,000 sq km, China has 50.5%, India 33.6%, the rest almost equally in
Bhutan and Bangladesh. Out of 2,880 km length of the river, 1,625 km
flows in Tibet, 918 km in India and 337 km in Bangladesh. A 510 MW dam
called Zangmu has been under construction since November 2010 and China
has built six other projects on the tributaries of the Tsangpo. It has
now declared that it is going to build 640 MW dams at Dagu, Jiexu (7 km
downstream of Dagu and 11 km upstream of Zangmu) and 320 MW at Jiacha.
Worryingly Xinhua, the official Chinese news agency, said the $1.2
billion Zangmu project "can also be used for flood control and irrigation".
For a project to be useful for irrigation and flood control, it needs to
store and divert water. The Zangmu and the other hydropower projects
will have adverse downstream impacts. Considering China's past record,
any assurances from them of being responsible towards downstream
countries do not hold water.
There is a tendency among supporters of dams to say that
run-of-the-river (RoR) projects, like the one that is being built at
Zangmu, are environment friendly. But the truth is such projects have
several adverse impacts: submergence, displacement, deforestation and
destruction of aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity, to name a few.
The Chinese projects on the Tsangpo will have significant impact on
India: changed water and silt flow patterns, increased flood and erosion
capacity of river and adverse impact on the biodiversity in the river
that has close links with the livelihoods of lakhs.
India has been less than firm with China on these issues. The government
informed Parliament in the past that China has not disclosed the reasons
for destructive floods in Himachal Pradesh in August 2000 and in
Arunachal Pradesh in June 2000, even though floods in both cases
originated from China. In fact, to say the truth, India's treatment of
impacts of its own such projects on downstream communities or those of
our neighbours has been far from inspiring.
One mechanism to tackle China could have been the United Nations
Convention on Non-Navigation Use of Water. But India did a disservice to
its cause by abstaining from voting in favour during the debate for the
convention and not ratifying it later. The only plausible course for
India now is to push for a water-sharing treaty with China.
Himanshu Thakkar is with the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers & People
The views expressed by the author are personal
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: email@example.com
To be removed from the list, please visit: